Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Sarah Palin serious about 2016
The Daily Iowan | April 28, 2014 | Cassidy Riley

Posted on 04/28/2014 6:10:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Link only: http://www.dailyiowan.com/2014/04/28/Metro/37707.html


TOPICS: Iowa; Campaign News; Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: 2016; gop; haters; hatersgonnahate; iowa; palin; palinisout; pds; sarahpalin; wontrun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last
To: Fai Mao
...the media created personae of who she is. She has been so vilified by the LSM that there she would never win.

If that's the case, then we might as well pack it up right now and surrender because it won't matter WHO the person is. The media and LSM will distort that "personae of who ____ is" and will vilify WHOEVER the limited government Christian right sider 2nd Party/NEW party political figure that rises to sate the political appetite of the MAJORITY of legitimate voting Americans.

Yes -- the majority, Americans who have systematically been overridden by a cheating minority. The MSM has folks bamboozled into thinking that the news it so carefully shapes and spins is "America," and then there's the real America, the one where malevolent leftists like Reid, Obama, Pelosi, etc., were rejected on the ground but who got official power via just enough fraudulent votes to tip the balance. That proves that there are more of us than there are of them. The MSM's villainous right and the "masses" who cheer and vote for liberal losers, are as real as the Easter Bunny.

You vest final authority in the media with your approach, Fai Mao. You have already surrendered to tyranny of a cheating minority.

121 posted on 04/29/2014 10:50:57 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; greene66; All
Vote 3rd party at least. If you leave your ballot blank, Al Franken can claim you voted for him...

THANK YOU, Sauropd!

Leaving the ballot blank is dumb. It's smarter to USE that vote to weaken whichever liberal wanker wins, Democrat or Republican. When you "vote 3rd party at least," you contribute to the plurality count. THAT WAS A GOOD THING when Perot's third party split put Clinton in on such a crappy plurality (57% rejected him) the first time that he got steamrolled by the Republican Revolution, and the second time (51 % rejected him), he was impeached.

Vote third party if only to vote for a plurality. A plurality split WILL AID CONSERVATISM whereas a majority for either liberal candidate, R or D, would aid leftism.

122 posted on 04/29/2014 11:07:33 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

You are such a surrender monkey, I can’t believe it! If a winning candidate depends on how the LSM paints him/her, then give up now. You are hunting unicorns.


123 posted on 04/29/2014 11:14:14 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
“I would love for Palin to set up a third party line that would only be actively promoted if Bush-christie-romney gets the nomination.” You and me both. Maybe it’s already in the works - who knows?

Well, we can pray! I think it is probable that we're going to need a third (SECOND!) party in 2016.

124 posted on 04/29/2014 11:19:14 AM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
Did Palin ever explain why she endorsed McCain in 2010? I don’t remember reading that.

Just so PDsers would have some reason to storm the Palin threads I guess. Sems to work well too.

125 posted on 04/29/2014 11:21:22 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HMS Surprise
I would offer that Palin is targeted precisely because the Left fears what she would do if she ever took the reins of power. It is why I support her. Heads... Will... Roll.

Strangely the same reasons that the GOPe fear her.

126 posted on 04/29/2014 11:26:21 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Serious about what? Serious about being a political force to be reckoned with? You Betcha!

Since when does anyone have to run for the Presidency to be a political force to be reckoned? If anything I think the position is vastly overrated.


127 posted on 04/29/2014 12:53:40 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Folks, the fix is in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum

I didn’t like her using the imagery of baptism. I have no objection to waterboarding in those circumstances where it’s appropriate, but it has nothing to do with the Christian sacrament of baptism. Her remark was unworthy, it offended many Christians, and she should just apologize and not dig herself in deeper.


128 posted on 04/29/2014 1:43:28 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Finny

It was also good when Ralph Nader ran. We (DC Chapter) saw him going into some ‘Rat event or other.

We made sure to thank him.


129 posted on 04/29/2014 6:52:29 PM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Oh “you betcha” I do!

But I was on to you anyways, however, I thought you played it out BRILLIANTLY. Your quick responses were spot in and hilarious.

They inspired me. I’m not even kidding. Keep up the good work.


130 posted on 04/29/2014 9:24:46 PM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: livius

“I didn’t like her using the imagery of baptism.”

So, there are lots of things I don’t like. Suck it up. Quit being a crybaby about it. Jesus wasn’t offended I promise.

“I have no objection to waterboarding in those circumstances where it’s appropriate, but it has nothing to do with the Christian sacrament of baptism.”

what’s your point? Of course the 2 don’t relate, that’s what made the comment funny.

“Her remark was unworthy, it offended many Christians”

No it didn’t. Please stop making stuff up. Who cares, we need to stop getting offended so easily. If that offended those so called Christians, then they certainly won’t be able to handle REAL persecution when it comes. Christians came out in a massive show of support for her actually, even when prompted to be offended by Hermann Cain and Laura Ingram

“and she should just apologize and not dig herself in deeper.”

Lol, so now we are turning into liberals demanding apologies every time our feelings are hurt? Besides, if you haven’t been baptized the way scripture instructs, then you are making a much worse mockery of baptism than you accuse Palin of.


131 posted on 04/29/2014 9:37:21 PM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: DrewsMum
..." Who cares, we need to stop getting offended so easily"...
132 posted on 04/29/2014 9:52:24 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-132 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson