Posted on 03/11/2014 7:00:31 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
What does that even mean? That some shall-remain-unnamed Republican colleague literally told her, presumably when asked why he supported the one percent budget cut to the federal food stamp program recently passed in the farm bill or why he did not support extending unemployment benefits or something, that his entire partys policy platform is based off of its collective and utter indifference to the plight of families in poverty? Why do I feel skeptical? Via RCP:
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
"I asked a Republican friend why his party remains so opposed to extending the vital lifelines for struggling families and really hungry children. This colleagues response was telling in its blunt nature and its stunning in its honestly. What he said was to the Republican caucus, these people you are talking about are invisible, and the Republican caucus is indifferent to them. Invisible and indifferent. This is just plain wrong. That is not the leadership the American people deserve and it is up to us to demonstrate clearly how Democrats are different."
Ahh, yes because with the Minority Leader, its never the case that Republicans have well-intentioned yet incorrect or impractical policy proposals. Its always the case that Republicans common unifying characteristic is their sociopathic disdain for their fellow human beings, or else their innate aversion to things like clean water and clean air or whatever. I mean, I get it: Who wants to have an uncomfortably honest discussion about policy outcomes when you can just slander Republicans for their ostensibly intrinsic derangement? As Ed already noted earlier today, its been mighty useful for Democrats to aggressively pretend that Republicans are the craven hyper-partisans in this rodeo (while they themselves are of course paragons of centrism and human compassion), so remember: The only possible solution for lifting people out of poverty is further expanding the already unsustainable entitlement state, or else youre an apathetic, uncompromising, black-hearted bottom-feeder.
I heard she was Barney Frank’s fluffer.
and maybe next time she makes speeches like this,she will have a candid audience and take open questions?
That’s odd Nancy, a Democrat friend of mine told me you eat small children after basting them with red wine sauce over an open fire.
When did Barney lose his eyesight?
Oh, Nancy, you and your imaginary friends!
The story doesn’t have the ring of truth, not a smidgen.
Democrats are systematically preparing a Maoist “Cultural Revolution” right here in America.
THAT is why they want your guns.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts
“Pelosi has a friend?!”
______________________________________________
I am sure she does, but no one that we would want to know anything about. They may not even be human.
Pelosi opens her mouth and lies spew forward; ha-ha, ha-ha, ha-ha. Of course whatever racist epithets yelled came from within the Caucus; most likely from Ellis. Do you think maybe Reid has a Pelosi costume and Pelosi has a Reid costume and they stand in for each other time to time
Some of her best friends are GOP.
And any one can figure out that the democrats really really hate children....on so many levels
Wasn’t it Dick Gephardt that used to have a lot of imaginary friends?
When he wasn’t telling us about his dinner table conversations with his small children about the benefits of collective bargaining.
Kind of like Blassio of NY is indifferent to really educated children!!!!
Well a friend of Pelosi told me she eats children.
Watch the video....Her eyes freak me out!
“A democrat friend told me than Nancy Pelosi sheds her skin like a snake”
Like a snake? C’mon, give Nan credit. She molts regularly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.