Posted on 02/28/2014 9:51:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Theres no way around it. Americas political establishment wants Bush vs. Clinton II.
Is resistance futile?
Every single Romney donor we spoke with this week listed the former Florida governor as their top choice
Also, with solid name recognition and the Bush political machine behind him, Romney donors believe Jeb is the most electable of the potential Republican candidates. For Romney donors, electability is the single most important trait.
If Jeb Bush is in the race, he clears the field, said one major Romney donor. You would have someone who has the talent that is equal to Mitt. The natural inclination for Mitt supporters would be to gravitate toward Jeb Bush because hes a candidate that can win a national race.
Another huge factor that would help Bush who has contacted some donors about their receptiveness to a presidential bid and is believed to be seriously considering throwing his hat in the ring is that his current gig as a senior adviser to Barclays Capital has helped him meet many of the Northeastern private equity types who filled Romneys campaign coffers.
Christies Bridgegate crumble is contributing to Bush fee-vah, but like WaPo says, Christie had already burned some bridges with Mittworld by babbling praise for Obama over Sandy relief the weekend before the 2012 election. Bush has been waiting around for Christiemania to cool among Republican centrists, and now it is, so here we are.
Help me understand this, though:
If Jeb Bush is in the race, he clears the field, said one major Romney donor.
Which field? Crowning George Bushs brother the new king of the Beltway Republicans isnt going to scare tea-party candidates out of the race. Rand Paul would rather face Christie than Bush for various reasons Bridgegate, lower name recognition, smaller donor network, plus the fact that Christie has antagonized many more Republicans over the last few years than Bush has but there are advantages to running against Jeb too. Now he gets to attack not just a RINO but a dynastic RINO, whose own mother thinks its poor form for the family to monopolize Republican nominations. Pauls brand is that hes a new kind of Republican; nothing would underscore that like running against a Bush, which means he might attract some voters who have issues with him but nonetheless want fresh faces in the partys leadership. (Im one of them. I like Paul but doubt Id support him in the primaries unless were given a stark old guard versus new guard choice.) And Paul may relish running against Bush even though it would make his task harder. If you want to shift the Republican Partys foreign policy paradigm to noninterventionism, you can do worse than have George W. Bushs brother as your opponent.
What the donor quoted by WaPo probably meant was that Bush would clear the centrist field. No more Christie: Hed conclude that hes too badly damaged to beat a well-funded Jeb and decide to support him instead. No more Rubio: The Florida Republican establishment would swing behind Jeb, leaving Rubio with no operational base. Probably no more Paul Ryan either. Even if he was inclined to run, itd be hard to make bank with Mitts old donors stampeding towards Bush and hard to turn to grassroots righties for support given that theyre peeved at him over amnesty and last years budget. But
what about Scott Walker or Bobby Jindal, who seems like hes quietly building a proto-campaign? Theyd make the same calculation that Paul will that some segment of Republicans will blanch at the thought of nominating another Bush, whether out of objections to dynasticism or because they fear the Bush name is unelectable at this point, and jump in. Theyd sell themselves as the Goldilocks option, more conservative than Crown Prince Jeb and more mainstream than Paul, and pull donations from both sides of the party. If/when the center and right reach a stalemate on Bush versus Paul, Walker or Jindal will be there as a compromise choice. The field wont clear, unless your idea of the field runs no further to the right than Rubio.
This crap makes me furious!
Of course Romney had to weigh in!
They never learn. They're in full-blown denial.
They imagine everyone thinks like they do, and they're dead-bang wrong.
You forgot Romney/MCCain 2016.
Woo hoo! Dole/Ford... oops, I mean Dole/McCain 2016!
Milt had a talent for being milquetoast.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
Bush III v Clinton II in 2016
They can have whomever they want, but they can’t have my vote.
“For Romney donors, electability is the single most important trait.”
Yeah. That’s it. Mitt was just so electable.
If we don’t do major damage to the DNC this year, it’s not going to matter who they run because I don’t think Barry will leave office.
I agree with you OneWing, you would make a better candidate than jeb.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts
Not my first choice but better Jeb than Hillary.
Well it must be true, it was in the Washington Compost/Daily Worker.
Now when the New York Slimes reports the same we may as well put our money away, cancel the conventions and go straight to an election.
Is it TRUE that the RNC is going to funnel MORE money directly into Reids pockets by holding their convention in Las Vegas?
With Reids ‘pals’ (Union hotel workers etal) preparing the food etc will be an adventure in itself and ALL the rooms will probably by wired with videocams etc so the Libs will be able to pick up more dirt for future elections.
For crying out loud.
Do you seriously believe that Jeb would win?
Yes, he could. He is down my list, but I would support Jeb over any Dem any day and I’m confident most Americans will too.
You're kidding yourself.
We've already had two Bush presidents within a matter of mere years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.