That simply isn't true. I've presented what virtually every significant known early legal authority had to say about the subject of natural born citizenship.
Not one of them, except for the thoroughly discredited Ramsay (who was never a legal authority to start with) EVER says it takes anything other than being "born a citizen" or "born in the United States."
So we know what they said it meant. And what they said it meant is NOT what you and other birthers claim it meant.
In this case, it's not our Founding Fathers and early legal authorities who are wrong. It's you. And the fact that you are unwilling to yield to the entire lineup of all known early American legal authorities shows how far down the rabbit hole of absolute fantasy you have gone.
No, you've cut and pasted in a collection of quotes around FR, which you believe support your theory of NBC. Not once on this thread have you even attempted to make the case for your interpretation, in your own words.
Jeff, I've now given you three chances to inform us as to why you believe what you do. Despite repeated requests, you've done nothing but rail against others' interpretations of NBC, and insist upon your own rightness (along with a liberal dose of ad hominems).
As I said in one of my earlier posts, you've proven able at assembling large quantities of words to throw at your debate opponents, but you've completely failed to convince anyone on the other side, with even the barest semblance of logic or reason.
In case you hadn't noticed, this a conservative audience. They're not easily swayed by boisterous naysaying and name calling. If you want to make a real case for your position, using those quotes you posted to back up your argument, then others will listen. If you're incapable of doing that, you may as well sit down.