She grew up, they never will.
Sarah will probably wait until her contract with FOX is settled/renewed. Sarah should be full go for 2016!
Thanks for the post, 2ndDivisionVet. Actually, just knowing the article is from the LA Times tells me all I need to know. LOL!
The sandwich industry is slowly coming back.
What she needs is an affiliation with a big-time sandwich entity.
SARAH IS THE BEST
WOW the left is truly terrified of Sarah Palin..thats all they think about..they are THAT scared that she might run and win it literally makes them poop bricks
I’m hoping it will be her time, she makes good decisions and is a true conservative AMERICAN LEADER.
Hell, Obama had baggage from September, but HE still got elected!
Whatever
I’m not going to bother to READ these idiot articles, but there sure are a lot of them, and that seems significant. It’s clear that the loony left fears Sarah more than anyone else.
As a conservative, I think she’s the best potential candidate I can remember seeing, ever. The only one with the guts, the principles, and the smarts needed to start straightening our country out, before we finish committing suicide.
Too bad the GOP doesn’t understand that, as the left clearly does. The pork guzzlers and corrupt lifetime power grubbers who run the party fear her even more than the left does, and with good reason.
I was very disappointed when she got crowded out this last time. Here’s hoping that the true conservatives and patriots in our country see the light, and gather behind her this time.
In before the Mitt lovers start trashing her?
Bush was our Clinton (I said that here in 1999).
Romney was our Kerry.
Palin is our Obama.
I’d vote for her. Not because I think she’s the best possible person, not because I find her attractive, but because of the people who oppose the notion of her being president. I would like nothing better than to watch Letterman and Maher’s heads explode the day after her being elected. I would like nothing better than to watch the Romneybots here on FR melting down in the primary season- and preferably being zotted. I would love to see the GOP-E sputter and choke on her being nominated, and elected, in spite of them. I judge her solely on the quality of her enemies, and that makes her worthy to hold the highest office- her being nominated and elected would piss off and piss on all the ones who deserve it.
I can’t help, but wonder if Sarah Palin had the insight to believe in her heart that it might not be possible to defeat Obama in 2012. Maybe that played a part in her decision not to run, hence saving her stock for 2016 when the allure of Obama is gone, and things are on a more even keel. She has proven time and again that she has an uncanny foresight of future events. Maybe someday she well tell all. I would like to know if she really thought 2012 was not winnable. I admit that I was fooled completely and thought Romney would win in a landslide, so it would really amaze me if she saw through it all.
Greetings from the other Great White North
LA Times Writer Uses Sexism and Lies Against Governor Palin
Posted on November 21 2012 - 2:22 PM - Posted by: Steve Flesher
Consider that Susan Rice, on behalf of the administration, is sent out in the middle of an election to do Obama’s dirty work. She makes the rounds refusing to categorize the attacks in Benghazi (which killed four Americans) as an act of terror. Even worse, instead of simply saying that we should await a full investigation before she remarks on the matter, she defaults to the Democrat-wild card by demonizing free speech here in the United States when she blamed the disaster on a YouTube video.
Now, sensible conservatives in Congress want her held accountable before she gets a promotion. That, according to actual elected liberals in Congress is enough to throw out yet another charge of racism (and sexism for good measure).
Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., says that the attacks on Rice have gone beyond her job performance. When asked about Rice on CNN’s Starting Point on Tuesday, Clyburn said that words like “lazy” and “incompetent,” which have been used to describe black members of the administration, including Rice and President Obama himself, are reminiscent of language used to undermine minorities in decades past.
“Lazy” and “incompetent” are “code words” for black politicians. Got it?
Okay, now let’s head over to the LA Times where, yet again, someone else has come out in a hysterical frenzy over ONE PRO-PALIN ARTICLE written.
Paul Whitefield decided to dispute Charlotte Allen’s article published last week: (emphasis added)
Caught “Game Change” on cable the other night.
Read Charlotte Allen’s Op-Ed article, “Hey, GOP, take the Palin cure,” in The Times on Sunday.
And what did I learn? Well, something doesn’t add up. Or, to paraphrase “I Love Lucy”: “Charlotte, you got some ’splainin’ to do.”
In her Op-Ed, Allen serves up equal parts lemonade and venomade in making her case that Sarah Palin should be the Republican presidential candidate in 2016. In Allen’s view, Palin has it all: She has blue-collar appeal, she’s “tough as nails,” and best of all, she’s a woman, which, in Allen’s world, gives her this advantage: “Men love Sarah Palin, and she loves men.”
Yep, just what the GOP needs: a Marilyn Monroe who hunts moose too.
[...]
Heck, if you want a Republican with common-man appeal, there’s a real governor in New Jersey right now who fits that bill.
So, how does one square Allen’s image of this Republican Party Joan of Arc with the petulant, ill-informed, diva-like Palin depicted in “Game Change”? (In an homage to Palin, I didn’t actually read the book; I settled for the shallow experience of watching the movie, though in true Palin style, I didn’t watch the whole thing.)
[...]
Commentators like Allen are all over the blogs, opinion sections and the TV and radio “news” and talk shows these days. Their aim is to provoke, to inflame — to hit the hornet’s nest and see how many angry people come out.
[F]or Charlotte Allen, the best thing about Sarah Palin is that she’s good for Charlotte Allen.
What would happen to me or to any other conservative blogger/writer if something this smearing and incendiary were written about Susan Rice, Barack Obama, or Hillary Clinton?
Here we have an alleged man implying that one pro-Palin article wasn’t written on merit, but was aimed to “provoke” and to get “angry people” to come out. I guess it couldn’t have anything to do with Governor Palin’s record of hard work and accomplishment. I suppose it couldn’t have anything to do with the fact that Governor (yes, the real Governor) Palin was able to do everything she set out to do in four years in only 2/3 of the time. Instead of realizing how incredible this was for feminism — considering that Governor Palin also has a husband and children to take care of — he ignores the logical facts surrounding her resignation, the record of real accomplishment she acquired, and the overall good she did for Alaska as its leader by fighting corruption, big oil, and special interests.
Nope! He chooses to cite a movie which has been thoroughly debunked time and time again. He chooses to take an innocuous remark made by Charlotte Allen about Governor Palin’s attractiveness to describe her as “Marilyn Monroe who hunts moose.” He then concludes by insinuating she wasn’t a “real Governor.”
Just what does this fella have to do before someone calls him a sexist pig?
Of course we can never expect the mainstream media to call it out — nor can we rely on the GOP establishment to do anything. This is why we have to continue our collective efforts to find ways around these very powerful and corrupt entities.
As Governor Palin described a few months ago at the Right Online conference, we now have the tools to meet this nonsense head on. We have to be the media when the other kind refuses to exercise professionalism and good judgment. Leaving comments, writing letters to the editor, talking about it with one another and with friends is a good place to start. We cannot allow these one-sided narratives to continue without challenge.
The lame stream media won’t know where to hide when Pres Palin takes her oath of office on Jan 20, 2017.
Please FReep this poll: