Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Since No President Has Ever Done This Badly In A Debate, We Have No Idea What It Will Do To Race
Hugh Hewitt ^ | October 3, 2012 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 10/04/2012 1:06:29 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

A historic defeat for a sitting president. Never has a POTUS been this badly whupped in a debate. It is that simple.

It wasn't just that Obama was so bad, but that Romney was so good. Conservatives see a candidate they did not know they had, and independents see a candidate who could turn the country around. No way to predict what this will do to campaign over a week.

Take aways: trickle down government, "you pick losers," and Solyndra and other green energy expenditures of 90 billion could have been 2 million teachers.

Throwing in the towel: Michael Moore, Andrew Sullivan, David Gregory, Ed Schultz.

Sports analogy: POTUS was the '54 Cleveland Indians --winningest team ever, and lost the Series in four games.

Caution to Team Romney and salve to the left: Mondale beat Reagan in the first debate in '04 (though not nearly as badly as Romney beat Obama tonight.)

Analogy? Agincourt?

On asking Lileks for an analogy, he noted that "Romney-Obama" will now serev as shorthand for a debate pummeling.

UPDATE: Don't believe me. Believe Andrew Sullivan:

10.31 pm. Look: you know how much I love the guy, and you know how much of a high information viewer I am, and I can see the logic of some of Obama's meandering, weak, professorial arguments. But this was a disaster for the president for the key people he needs to reach, and his effete, wonkish lectures may have jolted a lot of independents into giving Romney a second look.

Obama looked tired, even bored; he kept looking down; he had no crisp statements of passion or argument; he wasn't there. He was entirely defensive, which may have been the strategy. But it was the wrong strategy. At the wrong moment.

The person with authority on that stage was Romney - offered it by one of the lamest moderators ever, and seized with relish. This was Romney the salesman. And my gut tells me he sold a few voters on a change tonight. It's beyond depressing. But it's true.


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Polls
KEYWORDS: 2012; debates; obama; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Indeed.
1 posted on 10/04/2012 1:06:36 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Roughly thirty minutes into this debate...you could see moments of frustration on the President’s face and he probably wanted a end to this debate by the 60-minute point. It might have been better if Lehrer had held more “control” over two....but I thought that Lehrer gave a four-star presentation as moderator...fair to both guys.


2 posted on 10/04/2012 1:14:19 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Great job Romney. Let’s roll.


3 posted on 10/04/2012 1:14:34 AM PDT by Armaggedon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Caution to Team Romney and salve to the left: Mondale beat Reagan in the first debate in '04 (though not nearly as badly as Romney beat Obama tonight.)

The sum total of my financial contribution to 1988 was $20 to Bush. After the first debate, they put up a pair of 900 numbers (remember those?): call 1-900-A if Bush won, or 1-900-B if Dukakis won. It was obvious Dukakakis had won. So, I called the Bush number 20 times. I vote for the policy, not the candidate.

4 posted on 10/04/2012 1:19:19 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

5 posted on 10/04/2012 1:20:59 AM PDT by goron (Let's get this done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Never has a POTUS been this badly whupped in a debate. “

Reagan’s second debate against Mondale was awful. Truly awful. I would say worse than Obama tonight. He came back and aced the third debate.

I don’t think Obama was awful—just lackluster. Compared to Romney’s enthusiasm—heck, he was having fun—it looked worse than it was.

The other thing that made Obama look worse than he was is that Obama is so good with a teleprompter in front of him that you expected more, at least I did.

The big win for Romney tonight is that a challenger to a bad president still has to establish himself as credible and presidential. Romney accomplished that in spades tonight and added a big dose of likability. (Oh no, was that racist?)

The negative advertising is going to have a much harder time sticking after tonite.


6 posted on 10/04/2012 1:26:03 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
That's why early voting is a big mistake—there are face slaps all around by many who have already voted for Obama...

...Doh!

7 posted on 10/04/2012 1:28:11 AM PDT by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gee, I sure wish the election were held tomorrow....

There’s a long way to go.


8 posted on 10/04/2012 1:48:12 AM PDT by Bullish (The stink from this amateur regime smells all the way to Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Armaggedon

It was great to see Obama squirm.


9 posted on 10/04/2012 1:49:23 AM PDT by Bullish (The stink from this amateur regime smells all the way to Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

That’s why early voting is a big mistake—there are face slaps all around by many who have already voted for Obama...”

...I have my doubts. Anyone stupid enough to vote this turd in a 2nd time would never be swayed by a poor debate performance.


10 posted on 10/04/2012 1:50:16 AM PDT by albie ("Work as if you were to live a hundred years. Pray as if you were to die tomorrow." Benjamin Frankli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: albie


11 posted on 10/04/2012 2:18:37 AM PDT by goron (Let's get this done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

I still haven’t seen the whole debate, but I really got the feeling he just wanted to close and walk off the stage. Seriously.

Ever since he’s been President he has had that option. If he doesn’t like the question, he ignores it. If he gets bored, he just turns on his heel and walks away. This time, for the first time, he was on the hot-seat with no way to escape, no TelePrompTer to guide him, no way to escape the camera, and it showed.

He just plain sucked. Worse, he knew it. And Michelle is not going to be pleased.


12 posted on 10/04/2012 2:24:18 AM PDT by Ronin (Dumb, dependent and Democrat is no way to go through life - Rep. L. Gohmert, Tex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: albie
On the contrary—anyone stupid enough to vote for the fecal specimen would have such a weak mind he or she would be susceptible to the Jedi “voice.”

And last night was Obi Wan telling everybody that, “This isn’t the toid (”turd” in Brooklynese) you are looking for.”

13 posted on 10/04/2012 2:33:28 AM PDT by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Somebody needs to do something, quick. Call 911 and have Chris Matthews put on a suicide watch. Lock all the windows at MSNBC above the first floor.

The narrative will be: Jim Lehrer didn’t properly “control” the debate.


14 posted on 10/04/2012 2:55:43 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Orwell in the throes of a demonic possession could not have come up with the "tuck rule".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That “Trickle Down Government” they were talking about is the government urinating on us.


15 posted on 10/04/2012 3:36:17 AM PDT by Outrance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Analogy? Agincourt?

Nope. The French at Agincourt were Men of Valor and worthy of the highest respect.

On another point: Wow, how would you feel being labeled “effete” by Andrew Sullivan?!

16 posted on 10/04/2012 3:47:31 AM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama knows he’s going to lose and didn’t want to waste any time preparing.


17 posted on 10/04/2012 3:59:47 AM PDT by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama knows he’s going to lose and didn’t want to waste any time preparing.


18 posted on 10/04/2012 3:59:52 AM PDT by 5by5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The debate does not matter at all the way the Press covers for this guy. They KNOW what BO is like never the less he’s their man.


19 posted on 10/04/2012 4:01:12 AM PDT by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think if it were my job to spin Obamas performance from the debate the best I could do is say his performance in the debate was excellent compared to his performance as President the last 3 and 1/2 years
20 posted on 10/04/2012 4:36:09 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson