Skip to comments.
Mitt Romney compares himself to JFK as Nancy Reagan endorses him for presidency - VIDEO
Irish Central ^
| June 2, 2012,
| Antoinette Kelly
Posted on 06/02/2012 9:47:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: moonshot925
21
posted on
06/02/2012 10:33:30 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Kennedy’s were bootleggers and corrupt politicians, using their money to buy votes. Romney is a vulture capitalist.
Reagen earned his money, broadcasting, acting, and governing.
I don’t resent Reagan’s wealth, just law breakers and vultures, or anyone who uses the public tax money to get rich.
22
posted on
06/02/2012 10:33:33 AM PDT
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
To: moonshot925
Dearest Moonshot:
Putting Romney and Reagan as equals is ridiculous. I'm going to support the dude simply because the alternative is unthinkable. If he surprises us all I'll be more than happy (not holding my breath), but at this point we need to take out "The most destructive, the most anti-free market, anti-business, pro-Marxist, anti-life, anti-American, pro-gay, pro-muzzie, pro everything we hate with the will to do anything to sack our country administration ever!"
Romney is the only one who can do that, but very few of us are supporting Romney for any other reason than to take out "The most destructive, the most anti-free market, anti-business, pro-Marxist, anti-life, anti-American, pro-gay, pro-muzzie, pro everything we hate with the will to do anything to sack our country administration ever!"
Got it?
23
posted on
06/02/2012 10:35:55 AM PDT
by
Lakeshark
(NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
To: Mountain Mary
You don’t remember the way Reagan slimed conservatives and talked down to voters like we’re stupid? /s
24
posted on
06/02/2012 10:36:16 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: Drew68
Then you know that Reagan's tenure as President was far more conservative than his governance of California.
Hey, come on. Don't use those sophomoric debate tactics like using facts! We've got so much more important things going on here, like "conservatives" using their vote for a Pyhrric victory by voting for other than Obama's Republican challenger. Well, it would not even be a Pyhrric victory, considering that NO one other than the Republican candidate has a chance against a Democrat candidate. Call it Pyhrric Plus--all the devastating cost of the Pyhrric victory plus defeat. The only consolation would be able to say in retrospect, "It was a far better thing to have voted my conscience and let the nation truly go to hell than to vote against my conscience and have a least a shot of preventing the reelection of Barack Obama, because, you know, in the end, which is of longer lasting importance--trying to stop four years of evil becoming eight or more years of the same or engaging in a singular act of moral masturbation with its post-electoral glow of self-satisfaction no matter what? And, hey, we all know that if Mitt and a Republican House and Senate were elected, we as conservatives would have a LOT harder time getting them to go in a conservative direction than Obama."
25
posted on
06/02/2012 10:38:14 AM PDT
by
aruanan
To: moonshot925
Mittens, is that you? Moonshot, surely there are other Romneybot lovefest sites that are populated with slobbering fans of the Bishop like yourself. Free Republic isn’t one of them.
Maybe you should go blog somewhere where you will feel at home.
26
posted on
06/02/2012 10:38:14 AM PDT
by
Mountain Mary
(Head toward the sound of the guns in Wisconsin!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Pretty good analogy - Mitt and JFK - both socially liberal, fiscally prudent, pro-national-defense Democrats.
27
posted on
06/02/2012 10:41:42 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Since when do we resent success in this country? This isn't Europe!!
There are many jealous people in both parties who are not willing to work hard or smart enough to earn it on their own. They just want to complain about others success.
Mitt was not my first, second or even third choice, but he is the best of what is left.
He has shown he can turn companies and the Olympics around. None of those left running and even very few that ever were running can claim the economic successes of Romney.
28
posted on
06/02/2012 10:41:42 AM PDT
by
John D
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Romney still was able to get the number of uninsured from 6% to 2%, decrease the number of bankruptcies, grow the state economy and balance the budget. That is quite an accomplishment.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Only if he does a 180 from his Massachusetts governance. I worked for President Reagan, Friend, so I'll be hard to convince. Will I vote for Gov. Romney? I'd vote for Hubert Humphrey if he was running against Barack Obama! if Romney changes, it is called ‘evolution’ now....just ask the messiah
Hubert Humphrey was more pro gun than Romney.
Hubert H. Humphrey wrote: Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.
and I too will vote against the great satan, zer0bama....whomever the RNC sticks us with
30
posted on
06/02/2012 10:45:03 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: EGPWS
Not too many years ago, earned wealth was considered prestigious.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think he’ll surprise a lot of FReeps, when he become PRESIDENT!!
32
posted on
06/02/2012 11:26:38 AM PDT
by
ExCTCitizen
(If we stay home in November '12, don't blame 0 for tearing up the CONSTITUTION!!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Since when do we resent success in this country?" The media is trying to tell Americans to resent success or wealth. Yet, they themselves desire both with a passion. It is a weirdness inherent to liberals. They rant and rave about financial success, but they aspire to it as much as anyone. They hate Romney for earning millions, yet they adore the Pelosis, the Kerrys, the Kennedys and the Oprahs.
33
posted on
06/02/2012 11:31:43 AM PDT
by
Baynative
(REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
To: moonshot925
Romney is a Reaganite and will make a great President.Romney assured Massachusetts voters running for the Senate in 1994 that he did not want to go back Reaganomics.
34
posted on
06/02/2012 11:39:17 AM PDT
by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: moonshot925
Romney is a ReaganiteAnd just that easily you've blown the little credibility that you had.
35
posted on
06/02/2012 11:49:00 AM PDT
by
CommerceComet
(Obama vs. Romney - clear evidence that our nation has been judged by God and found wanting.)
To: moonshot925
Beavis & Butthead: He. He,he, Romney's a Tool.
36
posted on
06/02/2012 11:52:45 AM PDT
by
MotorCityBuck
( Keep the change, you filthy animal!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So, finally admitting he’s still a lib Rat.
37
posted on
06/02/2012 12:01:45 PM PDT
by
bgill
To: 2ndDivisionVet
not two words, two choices Obama or Romney?
38
posted on
06/02/2012 12:10:28 PM PDT
by
edzo4
(You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
To: edzo4
Governor Romney, for all his many faults, can’t be worse for this country than Mr. Obama. Therefore, one has to vote for Romney. This is a two-party system, any other vote is a waste of the franchise, is it not?
39
posted on
06/02/2012 12:14:54 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
To: moonshot925
Welcome to freerepublic, but your few days of posting has already outed you as a bomb throwing troll.
40
posted on
06/02/2012 12:18:24 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson