Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Gingrich playbook: He expects to be fighting all the way to the GOP convention floor
The Los Angeles Times ^ | February 2, 2012 | Doyle McManus

Posted on 02/02/2012 6:32:02 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Newt Gingrich says he's staying in the Republican presidential race all the way to the GOP convention in August, and that he's willing — even eager — to fight for the nomination on the convention floor. But does he have a chance?

Gingrich and his aides seem to think so, and they have a theory of how they can wrest the nomination from Mitt Romney.

It begins with pushing Rick Santorum to the sideline and uniting the party's conservative majority behind Gingrich. That's why Gingrich claimed a victory in having turned the campaign into a two-man race in Florida on Tuesday night instead of conceding defeat.

Next, Gingrich needs to win some additional caucuses and primaries — the Minnesota caucus on Feb. 7, for example, and several of the seven primaries on Super Tuesday, March 6.

And even if all that broke Gingrich's way, he might still have to battle Romney for the nomination on the convention floor, an exotic scenario that Gingrich has embraced and says is part of his battle plan.

"It's very likely that at the convention there will be a non-Romney majority [of delegates], and maybe a very substantial one," Gingrich told reporters this week. "My job is to convert that into a Gingrich majority."

But even for a candidate who prides himself on thinking outside the box, the idea of a wide-open convention takes some imagination.

No major party has needed more than one ballot to choose a nominee since 1952, when the Democrats selected Adlai Stevenson. The 1976 Republican convention came close because neither President Gerald R. Ford nor challenger Ronald Reagan had a majority on opening night — but Ford still managed to win on the first ballot.

Gingrich and his aides point to several reasons their plan might work....

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; Polls; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2012; gingrich; newt; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Plausible?
1 posted on 02/02/2012 6:32:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Newt needs to talk jobs. Stop the “America Going Out of Business” track and get us moving in the right direction. New businesses instead of closing or bankrupt businesses.

And he needs to start reminding American that we still have the best healthcare system in the world but won’t have if we blow this chance. Americans have short memories, remind them of the the lines, waits, and general horrible healthcare in other countries.


2 posted on 02/02/2012 6:36:38 PM PST by Kenny (<p><i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If there is a non-Romney majority, but no single candidate has a majority, I think the more likely result is Rick Santorum as the compromise candidate who is acceptable to all sides. His one major drawback is a lack of money and organization, and once you’re the party’s nominee, that problem all goes away.

He has the clean-cut, boy scout image that some voters (incorrectly) have of Romney, and he has Gingrich’s conservatism. But he doesn’t have money.


3 posted on 02/02/2012 6:43:18 PM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If nobody gets an outright majority of delegates, then anything goes.

Remember - Romney’s delegates are only bound to him in the first round of balloting. After than, they can go to whomever. Of course, same goes for everybody else’s delegates...

Time to sneak in Jim DeMint as a compromise candidate!


4 posted on 02/02/2012 6:45:28 PM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Okay, but what executive experience does he have? Speaker Gingrich ran the House in what many consider the second most important position in the US government. Gov. Romney, of course, ran a state and a company, as well as the Olympics. What has Rick done that even comes close? Don’t we already have a neophyte senator fowling things up?


5 posted on 02/02/2012 6:50:09 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Jim DeMint is a Romney man. I doubt if he would torpedo Milt.


6 posted on 02/02/2012 6:52:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

Newt spoke about the Keystone pipeline, kids working in schools involving the private sector in space exploration which has been ridiculed. However, the Chinese are already working on that very project and plan to have a base on the moon by 2025. Newt spoke about reducing taxes on companies, corps and also removing govt regulations so they could hire more employees and get back to business without the govt down their throats. In reality it is not the job of the govt to provide jobs..it is their responsibility to quit stiffling free enterprise


7 posted on 02/02/2012 6:56:04 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Romney spent somewhere between 15-17 millipn dollars in Florida to win what looks like 10 delegates. He can’t continue that indefinitely.


8 posted on 02/02/2012 6:57:36 PM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m just telling you what I think will happen. I would still favor Sarah Palin or Jim DeMint, but I don’t think they would get it.


9 posted on 02/02/2012 6:59:12 PM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I trust Newt to know what he is doing. Going to be a very exciting convention. Newt is not going to give Mitt a lay down, and I support Newt in this.


10 posted on 02/02/2012 7:10:04 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1
In reality it is not the job of the govt to provide jobs..it is their responsibility to quit stifling free enterprise

Agreed but truly gutting goverment programs and putting us on track for fiscal recovery will restore confidence and encourage people to start living their lives normally.

11 posted on 02/02/2012 7:15:43 PM PST by Kenny (<p><i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

I believe that when Santorum drops out if he does, he will endorse Romney, just like he endorsed Spectre.

I do not trust Santorum.


12 posted on 02/02/2012 7:28:08 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Santorum is an establishment guy who made no waves in the Senate for 2 terms and has a deadly unpleasant personality that manages to pick up all the worst parts of Jimmy Carter prissiness. Nobody will vote for him.

We’re voting for somebody’s wife and children.


13 posted on 02/02/2012 7:36:16 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

The thing is, most Santorum voters are favoring him over Newt not because of the difference in their personal lives (though some are) but because of his outspokenness on moral issues. Even if Santorum endorses Romney, will his voters really embrace the intermittently pro-abortion, gay-marriage supporting Romney? I doubt it.

It would be better if Santorum dropped out and endorsed Gingrich, but the main thing is for him to drop out.


14 posted on 02/02/2012 7:37:35 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Sorry, that is, we’re NOT voting for somebody’s wife and children. Santorum is not a conservative in any way except for his pro-life positions, and even then his rating is lower than Gingrich’s.


15 posted on 02/02/2012 7:37:54 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m VERY saddened to say that 0bama is going to be re-elected.

Unless someone from the ‘outside’ like Palin jumps in RIGHT NOW to save the day, we’re screwed! It looks like Romney is going to take the nomination via the primaries. If he’s on the ticket, conservatives will stay home like never before. A republican CAN NOT win without an enthusiastic conservative base. I’d probably still vote for him(and be VERY unhappy doing so) just with the hopes of getting rid of 0bama, but I could perfectly understand why someone would sit it out with him at the top of the ticket. He’s a Massachusetts LIBERAL for God’s sake! How in the hell could he possibly come within a mile of winning a single republican primary is beyond me!!!!

If Gingrich somehow manages to gain the nomination at the convention, it will leave such a mess, the situation will become impossible. That’s the scenario we were all hoping would unfold between Hillary and 0bama in 2008, as our only hope McAmnesty would actually come out on top. Even if Gingrich would have been straight up nominated through the primaries, he wouldn’t have been electable in the first place!

How in God’s name did it comes to this? 0bama is a liberal. He’s easily the worst president during my lifetime(I have no memory of Carter). All the republicans had to do was nominate a good solid conservative candidate, and this thing would have been easy. The Dems almost couldn’t have sat down and planned it to turn out any worse for us! Maybe that’s what happened......

I’m not being a defeatist here. I’m a realist, and I know realism often has no place among many folks here.

Flame away......


16 posted on 02/02/2012 8:01:05 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Plausible?”

He must. Not just for himself, but for all of us.

A Romney candidacy is not merely wide open compromise with moderates on the McCain model, is an absolute capitulation to the Clinton-Obama left. At that point Republican policies on abortion, HealthControl, Second Amendment rights, DHS overreach, TARP and all of its progeny, internet freedom, media freedom and the welfare state will be -indistinguishable- from that of the Democrats.

There is a fork in the road ahead of us. Romney will take us to a place of peonage and - at best - the authoritarian State. Gingrich will take us to a place where we will not be delivered from those dangers, but we will still have a fighting chance against them.

The dead souls who have run the GOP for the past two decades are very near total victory. They have pushed the TEA party accomplishments almost back to zero. We must defeat them, or form a new party based upon individual liberty and the rule of law. The GOP respects neither of these things. That is all there is to it.


17 posted on 02/02/2012 8:01:52 PM PST by Psalm 144 (Gov. Perry quit for the right reasons, in the right way, at the right time. Thank you, sir.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
If we send MONEY, did you hear that? MONEY to Gingrich, he'll take it before the convention.

If there's anyone on this forum that has not sent money to Gingrich, please don't address me in your posts.

You suck.

18 posted on 02/02/2012 8:09:56 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

No, you had it correct the first time...you are being a defeatist. Newt knows what he is doing and if you were a general leading troops to battle you would suck!


19 posted on 02/02/2012 8:10:52 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fabian
"if you were a general leading troops to battle you would suck!"

...And that's why I'm not a general! lol

20 posted on 02/02/2012 8:15:39 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson