Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich implodes the conventional wisdom
The Standard-Examiner ^ | December 16, 2011 | Joe Gandelman

Posted on 12/16/2011 8:32:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

HILLSBORO, Missouri -- What if a state held a non-binding presidential primary and the current front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination wasn't on the ballot? That'll happen in Missouri on March 17 and just weeks ago the always correct (except when it's wrong) conventional wisdom insisted this illustrated how former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had no "ground game." And so, it was implied, Gingrich was doomed in his battle against his prime challenger, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Until now.

If you've been woken up with a "BOOM!" it was the sound of the conventional wisdom imploding.

The catalyst was the demise of former Godfather's CEO Herman Cain's candidacy as the anti-Romney in hardline conservatives' ongoing battle with the Republican Party's center-right establishment. Then came the (in)famous ABC Yahoo debate where Gingrich solidified his status as the party's best debater. And I'll bet Mitt Romney three White Castle hamburgers plus a baggie of my toenail clippings that Romney's challenge to bet Texas Gov. Rick Perry $10,000 that Perry was wrong about what he claimed Romney said in his book gave Romney the image of someone born with a silver flip-flop in his mouth.

How could the conventional wisdom fail? Because it feeds on itself.

Often smug pundits who do cable shows, write political stories, or write columns (like me) read or listen to each other which creates an unintentional group narrative reinforced by a) narrative-compatible polls and b) the pundits' confidence in their own analytical abilities. It's less an echo chamber than disciples repeating a Guru's mantra with supreme faith in the end result. If a conventional wisdom narrative fails it's seldom acknowledged and discreetly discarded.

The new CW line is that Romney is a 2011 version of the 2008 Hillary Clinton hampered by his state healthcare plan, not his Iraq War stand. Actually, Gingrich is a 2011 version of the 2008 John McCain who seemed politically dead yet but made a fool of the conventional wisdom by getting the Republican nomination in the end.

Gingrich is a highly intelligent, charismatic quote machine bursting with ideas (some of them lousy) who takes glee in negatively defining and demonizing foes. The conventional wisdom underestimated his appeal since Romney was more of a 20th century GOP candidate, has a huge campaign chest plus impressive GOP establishment support. Gingrich is the GOP's 21st century Tea Party movement and talk radio political culture candidate. In fact, he helped shape the polarizing, confrontational talkers' style and mega-partisan politics we all "enjoy" today.

Some top conservative talk personalities are now alarmed by Gingrich's ascent because they fear The Old "Bad" Newt (circa 1992) could re-emerge, commit political suicide by mouth and blow their party's chance to defeat the job-approval-challenged President Barack Obama. Ann Coulter is a virtual Romney surrogate. Glenn Beck calls Gingrich too progressive. Michael Savage even offered Gingrich $1 million to drop out because among other things, he wrote on his website, in presidential debates Gingrich "will come off badly compared to Obama and look like nothing more than what he is: a fat old white man."

Actually Savage should have offered Gingrich money to quit and be a historian: after all, Gingrich says he got paid at least $300,000 for that before (it wasn't lobbying, you see). If Romney had a sense of humor he'd bet Savage a can of his hair spray that Gingrich won't drop out.

This is no laughing matter. Gingrich is a supremely polarizing figure who'd turn off moderates, many independents, non-liberal Democrats, and further divide a divided country. Even some who worked with him suggest his temperament and ego are scary for the Oval Office. Pollster Whit Ayres to The Hill: "Those who know him best are not his strongest supporters."

But he tops Romney in South Carolina and Florida polls (big-time) just as polls show Romney doing better against Obama.

The pundits' and Democrats' conventional wisdom now is that Gingrich could be nominated but will likely self-destruct so there's little chance he can REALLY be elected president.

Given the conventional wisdom's recent accuracy, Gingrich might want to contact Tiffany's and see if they make presidential seal-themed office drapes.


TOPICS: Campaign News; Issues; Parties; Polls
KEYWORDS: gingrich; missouri; newt; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Hugin

Only one poll I’ve seen shows that, and it’s Gingrich 43 to Obama 42 in Ohio http://miamiherald.typepad.com/nakedpolitics/2011/12/swing-states-q-poll-gingrich-well-over-romney-who-matches-better-v-obama-.html. Other that that, it’s Obama by a mile http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_gingrich_vs_obama-1453.html, http://www.nationalpolls.com/2012/obama-vs-gingrich.html. Please direct me to your source...


21 posted on 12/16/2011 10:26:59 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Between them, I’d prefer Newt over Romney but after the FOX debate I think Romney may still edge his way into the nomination. Romney has so many surrogates carrying his water, it’s ridiculous!


22 posted on 12/17/2011 12:11:06 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama, Reid and Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Between them, I’d prefer Newt over Romney but after the FOX debate I think Romney may still edge his way into the nomination. Romney has so many surrogates carrying his water, it’s ridiculous!


23 posted on 12/17/2011 12:11:06 AM PST by newzjunkey (Republicans will find a way to reelect Obama, Reid and Pelosi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What if Newt has changed and does not lose his temper or loses it with a macaca moment? I am sure Newt has his hands on the controls with a well disciplined grip that he has learned from years of persistence.

I think if Newt keeps it up, he will do well and thrash Obama in the elections.

24 posted on 12/17/2011 12:32:04 AM PST by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

A dead bug in the middle of Hollywood Blvd. would beat Obammie... that’s why the media-idiots and other followers are so skeered.


25 posted on 12/17/2011 12:48:31 AM PST by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

KABOOM!!!!!!... and he keeps on running... just like that little energizer bunny.... ha!


26 posted on 12/17/2011 12:50:57 AM PST by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I don’t think Newt will have any trouble beating Barry in the general election.


27 posted on 12/17/2011 6:25:10 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson