Posted on 12/16/2011 8:32:46 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
HILLSBORO, Missouri -- What if a state held a non-binding presidential primary and the current front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination wasn't on the ballot? That'll happen in Missouri on March 17 and just weeks ago the always correct (except when it's wrong) conventional wisdom insisted this illustrated how former House Speaker Newt Gingrich had no "ground game." And so, it was implied, Gingrich was doomed in his battle against his prime challenger, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Until now.
If you've been woken up with a "BOOM!" it was the sound of the conventional wisdom imploding.
The catalyst was the demise of former Godfather's CEO Herman Cain's candidacy as the anti-Romney in hardline conservatives' ongoing battle with the Republican Party's center-right establishment. Then came the (in)famous ABC Yahoo debate where Gingrich solidified his status as the party's best debater. And I'll bet Mitt Romney three White Castle hamburgers plus a baggie of my toenail clippings that Romney's challenge to bet Texas Gov. Rick Perry $10,000 that Perry was wrong about what he claimed Romney said in his book gave Romney the image of someone born with a silver flip-flop in his mouth.
How could the conventional wisdom fail? Because it feeds on itself.
Often smug pundits who do cable shows, write political stories, or write columns (like me) read or listen to each other which creates an unintentional group narrative reinforced by a) narrative-compatible polls and b) the pundits' confidence in their own analytical abilities. It's less an echo chamber than disciples repeating a Guru's mantra with supreme faith in the end result. If a conventional wisdom narrative fails it's seldom acknowledged and discreetly discarded.
The new CW line is that Romney is a 2011 version of the 2008 Hillary Clinton hampered by his state healthcare plan, not his Iraq War stand. Actually, Gingrich is a 2011 version of the 2008 John McCain who seemed politically dead yet but made a fool of the conventional wisdom by getting the Republican nomination in the end.
Gingrich is a highly intelligent, charismatic quote machine bursting with ideas (some of them lousy) who takes glee in negatively defining and demonizing foes. The conventional wisdom underestimated his appeal since Romney was more of a 20th century GOP candidate, has a huge campaign chest plus impressive GOP establishment support. Gingrich is the GOP's 21st century Tea Party movement and talk radio political culture candidate. In fact, he helped shape the polarizing, confrontational talkers' style and mega-partisan politics we all "enjoy" today.
Some top conservative talk personalities are now alarmed by Gingrich's ascent because they fear The Old "Bad" Newt (circa 1992) could re-emerge, commit political suicide by mouth and blow their party's chance to defeat the job-approval-challenged President Barack Obama. Ann Coulter is a virtual Romney surrogate. Glenn Beck calls Gingrich too progressive. Michael Savage even offered Gingrich $1 million to drop out because among other things, he wrote on his website, in presidential debates Gingrich "will come off badly compared to Obama and look like nothing more than what he is: a fat old white man."
Actually Savage should have offered Gingrich money to quit and be a historian: after all, Gingrich says he got paid at least $300,000 for that before (it wasn't lobbying, you see). If Romney had a sense of humor he'd bet Savage a can of his hair spray that Gingrich won't drop out.
This is no laughing matter. Gingrich is a supremely polarizing figure who'd turn off moderates, many independents, non-liberal Democrats, and further divide a divided country. Even some who worked with him suggest his temperament and ego are scary for the Oval Office. Pollster Whit Ayres to The Hill: "Those who know him best are not his strongest supporters."
But he tops Romney in South Carolina and Florida polls (big-time) just as polls show Romney doing better against Obama.
The pundits' and Democrats' conventional wisdom now is that Gingrich could be nominated but will likely self-destruct so there's little chance he can REALLY be elected president.
Given the conventional wisdom's recent accuracy, Gingrich might want to contact Tiffany's and see if they make presidential seal-themed office drapes.
In spite of what the various polls say at this point. Zane Gingrich will not have an easy time of it.
I think author has his own Conventional Wisdom problem. The polls show Gingrich beats Obama in the swing states. Obama might rack up big popular vote tallies in blue states, but he would lose the election according to current polls.
He’s dead right about the “echo chamber” - I cannot believe how wrapped-up people on FR and elsewhere get over the opinions expressed by some pundit or bloviator who earns a living by expounding and bloviating! It doesn’t matter what “they” think - TO ME - but it sure seems to matter to themselves, and thus the feedback loop continues.
Bush was too lazy. Palin was too dumb. Cain is too frisky. Newt is too bombastic. Perry can’t count. Bachmann has too many foster kids. And the beat goes on...
People need to wake up the mechanism between their own ears, forget what talking heads, pollsters, and Frank Luntz’s meters say and just listen, read, analyze and vote their own conscience.
Glenn Beck recently devoted almost an entire show on Newt and his big government progressivism. If you are a Newt fan and caught the show, it must have been very uncomfortable viewing. Glenn was at his persuasive best.
I suspect there will be NO conventional anything about the political circus we will witness next year.
Of all the Republican candidates, the only one I perceive having a shred of leadership is Newt Gingrich.
Meanwhile, legions of people are busily working to stop Obama’s candidacy at all 50 states, challenging his eligibility at the state level. Also, there is a group challenging the Democratic Party to prove Obama is eligible.
No one is going to have a cake walk into the White House this coming year.
Agree, bb. And we all need to remember what the stakes are if Bam wins again:
1. Any Conservative Supreme Court judges will automatically be replaced with Elena Kagen/Sonya Sotomayor clones or worse, killing our five/four majority chances.
2.House: need to keep it.
3.Senate: need to take it back.
4.Governorships: need to elect more GOP/Conservatives.
We’ve got our work cut out for us guys.
There are three branches of government that the Progressives hope to conquer and destroy.
By way of observation, Glen, too, is a mormon.
Eff the polls and the elite GOP establishment, we WILL nominate a conservative.
I suspect there will be NO conventional anything about the political circus we will witness next year.
Of all the Republican candidates, the only one I perceive having a shred of leadership is Newt Gingrich.
Meanwhile, legions of people are busily working to stop Obama’s candidacy at all 50 states, challenging his eligibility at the state level. Also, there is a group challenging the Democratic Party to prove Obama is eligible.
No one is going to have a cake walk into the White House this coming year.
“(it wasn’t lobbying, you see)”
Obviously this clown does not know the difference between a consultant and a lobbyist.
Correction.
‘Any “retiring” Supreme Court justices’...blah, blah, blah.
He has two “Ns” in his first name—stands for numb nuts.
I still think that anyone who can fog a mirror is better than what’s sitting in the White House right now.
Maybe it’s not an “echo chamber” but a cage filled with parrots, first parroting their masters,the pundits, and then each other. The arguments against (whoever) heard here and elsewhere have been lame, shallow and unoriginal.
So?
Got it now?
Glen Beck isn’t from Utah. Care to try again?
“Newt Gingrich Implodes” — That’s the headline I still expect to see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.