Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/19/2011 11:23:01 AM PDT by TLittlefella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
To: TLittlefella

As with any home purchase, you factor taxes into the cost. Be smart, don’t be dazzled by sparkly new things.


2 posted on 10/19/2011 11:25:45 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

Was this post written by the Romney Campaign Committee?


3 posted on 10/19/2011 11:26:38 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
Too bad your analysis is complete divorced from all fact.

Guess you missed the fact that this replaces the current corrupt failed system, it does not add to it.

4 posted on 10/19/2011 11:28:28 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

zzzzz


6 posted on 10/19/2011 11:29:56 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
"Under the current tax system that same couple using the standard 1040EZ tax return would pay $50,000 minus $18,700 (married couple deduction) = $31,300 taxable income. "

And therein lies the problem with the current tax code. Why should married couples pay less in taxes than a single person? Why does the single person get punished? I pay $4000 per year more in federal income taxes than a married couple simply because I am single. That ain't right!

7 posted on 10/19/2011 11:30:53 AM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
Sorry, no Romneycare, No tuition breaks to illegals, no flipflops on pro-life issues, no man made global warming believers.
8 posted on 10/19/2011 11:31:08 AM PDT by federal__reserve (Economy on life support needs a revolutionary tax plan, not fiddle around the edges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

Wow congratulations, you managed to post a whole rant and not get even 1 single fact correct!


9 posted on 10/19/2011 11:31:25 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

I watched that “flip/flop” video. It gives such short snippets of what was said in so many cases, with so little (or no) context as to be completely without merit. It’s laughable.


10 posted on 10/19/2011 11:32:42 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

The Perry plan...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/perry-commits-flat-tax-reforming-entitlements_598305.html


12 posted on 10/19/2011 11:34:13 AM PDT by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
Don’t ask me what candidate is any better because I just don’t know.

No surpise, typical Romney campaign tactics. Romney pays his campaign-bots to deny all ties to Romney while recklessly trash talking his competitor. He has done it in every single race he has ever been in.

You would think with all his money Romney could hire better campaign bots then those who's best effort is this emotional ridden hysteric trash talk.

13 posted on 10/19/2011 11:34:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

Ooops, you caught me picking my nose.


14 posted on 10/19/2011 11:34:57 AM PDT by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
Anyone up for paying $18,000 sales tax on the next $200,000 house you purchase?

I know this has been pointed out to you numerous times, but surely you realize that $200,000 price on the house has built into it all the hidden taxes the builder paid during construction plus their profit.

So, you could be paying $16,200 sales tax on the same exact house that now costs only $180,000 assuming only a 10% decrease in retail price even though many studies show the tax burden on products is as much as 40%.

You repeatedly ignore COGS (Cost Of Goods Sold), but I can tell you this, businesses don't ignore it. You assume that all retail sales entities will conspire to not drop prices based on their lower COGS. You assume no business will lower prices to make a market share play. Yet, in reality, businesses do this all the time.

17 posted on 10/19/2011 11:35:33 AM PDT by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
9-9-9 is same old "catchy" sales pitch that folks have been using for years...the $.99 cent burger, the $9.99 pizza, the $99.99 tire....

People just gobble it up without thinking....the one day sale....that makes you jump on the bandwagon. I thought freepers were smarter than that.

18 posted on 10/19/2011 11:35:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

I’m not a 999 expert. Under the fair tax, the tax is paid by the original purchaser of a new house. Pre-owned houses do not pay a sales tax.

The builder, suppliers, manufacturers all have their taxes lowered. Competition will drive the new house prices down when these embedded costs are removed. You were already paying the tax that was a cost of doing business for the builder. Now it is up front and visible.


19 posted on 10/19/2011 11:36:03 AM PDT by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella
You assume that 200K house doesn't have the current tax code already figured into its price. It does. Let the free market rule. No more gov’t intervention in the free market.
22 posted on 10/19/2011 11:39:16 AM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

Moving at least part of the tax burden from an income tax on production onto a sales tax on new goods would be one of the best possible things we could do for the middle class.

The middle class in this country is dying.

Our manufacturing industry which used to provide the foundation of the economy for the middle class has fled to more hospitable lands.

The 9-9-9 plan dramatically reorients the incentives in the economy away from service jobs and back to capital-intensive production of goods and places part of the tax burden onto goods produced by foreign businesses.

Without something this dramatic, there is really little hope of changing the future prospects of the middle class in this country.


23 posted on 10/19/2011 11:40:26 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

Anyone who has spent more than one day in Europe knows what a VAT does. Consider this VATS in Norway, Denmark, Sweden – 25%. Top tax rates in those countries are about 60% on anything over, about, 70k a year. Add ‘em together – and you’ll understand why a 10 pack of Coke costs $10 or a McD’s Value Meal is $15.


24 posted on 10/19/2011 11:41:18 AM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

As part of being a responsible spender of my money I always buy used houses and used vehicles.

Also I buy used because the insurance rates are less epxensive as well.

And i don;t mind paying 9% sales tax on food if the food prices are lower and if the EBT queen is making the government pay itself back on food stamp purchases.

Boo freekin’ hoo....


25 posted on 10/19/2011 11:41:58 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

I understand that there is an “occassional sales rule” exemption to the sales tax, just like in most state sales taxes.

That is, if you are not a retail business or otherwise don’t routinely make money by selling things, the tax does not apply.

I think the standard rule is no sales tax on:

(1) two sales in a rolling 12 month period;

(2) sales of the assets of a company or a division of a company.

So a house, for example, would not be subject to a sales tax.

Similarly, a food and clothing up to a certain dollar amount would not have a tax.


26 posted on 10/19/2011 11:42:16 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLittlefella

Cain made a mistake by promoting a specific simplification plan. The 9-9-9 plan is a balanced plan between personal income tax, business taxes, and consumption taxes. Other approaches are the Fair Tax (all sales tax) and Flat Tax (all income tax). I am not sure which plan is preferred. All would be preferred to the mess that we have now unless you are a member of the tax freeloading group. He should emphasize the principles of tax reform (simplification, non politicization, transparency, and others) as a vital element of economic revitalzation.

I find it distasteful the attacks on Republican candidates by other Republicans. I will support the Republican nominee and not speak ill of any candidate (except Ron Paul). Conservatives will not win unless we are unified.


27 posted on 10/19/2011 11:48:16 AM PDT by businessprofessor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson