Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Create jobs by ending Bush & Obama's "appeasement" trade policy ("President Palin")
Richman's Trade and Tax Blog ^ | June 12, 2011 | Howard Richman

Posted on 06/13/2011 12:57:31 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

President Obama's stimulus has failed, just as we predicted. Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke's QE2 has failed, just as we predicted. The administration and the Federal Reserve have run out of ideas. There is still a solution, but Washington is ignoring it. University of Maryland economist Peter Morici sums it up in a June 9 commentary (Cut Trade Gap to Create Jobs). Here is a selection:

The trade deficit, along with the credit and housing bubbles, were the principal causes of the Great Recession. A rising trade deficit again threatens to sink the recovery and push unemployment to more than 10 percent....

At 3.5 percent of gross domestic product, the trade deficit subtracts more from the demand for U.S.-made goods and services than U.S. President Barack Obama's stimulus package added. The Obama stimulus was temporary and is dissipating, whereas the trade deficit is permanent and swollen again....

Cutting the trade deficit in half over three years would increase U.S. GDP by about $500 billion and create up to 5 million additional jobs. This would increase growth to 3.6 percent from the expected 2.5 percent and lower the unemployment rate by 3 percentage points....

Longer term, the combination of expensive oil imports and China's currency policies reduce U.S. growth by one percentage point a year. The U.S. economy would likely be $1.5 trillion larger today but for the trade deficits on oil and with Asia over the last 10 years.

Morici advocates more oil and gas drilling to reduce our imports on foreign oil. He also advocates a currency-conversion tax on Chinese products to balance trade with China. Morici concludes by calling our current trade policy with China "appeasement":

After diplomacy has failed for both Presidents George W. Bush and Obama, failure to act amounts to no more than appeasement and wholesale neglect of the administration's obligations to create a level playing field for U.S. workers.

Morici is correct. The United States is probably going to experience years more of high unemployment, simply because Washington's trade appeasement policy. That could change if Governor Palin is elected president. At the moment she is advocating both of the policies that Morici advocates: balanced trade and more drilling for domestic gas and oil.


TOPICS: Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: china; economy; energy; obama; oil; palin; sarahpalin; tariff; tariffs; taxes; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
More and more people are waking up.
1 posted on 06/13/2011 12:57:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Palin isn’t a protectionist. Her route to balanced trade is the removal of the burdens on American industry, not some ‘shoot-yourself-in-the-foot’ tariff.


2 posted on 06/13/2011 2:27:27 AM PDT by agere_contra ("Debt is the foundation of destruction" : Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The trade deficit is not the cause of our economic malaise. Protectionism will only make matters worse.
3 posted on 06/13/2011 2:30:49 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; agere_contra; Hoodat
A little tariff now and then aint so bad:


The Amazing Harley-Davidson Story

4 posted on 06/13/2011 3:06:56 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Bushs’ fault. And I mean that literally.

I am really not sure how any of the Bushs were any different than Clinton or Obama.

It must just be me...i guess?

They are all the same from my point of view. And they are all thieving criminals. Certainly they are all multi multi multi millioairs

every one

5 posted on 06/13/2011 3:16:19 AM PDT by 240B (he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

President Palin will fix it in 2013


6 posted on 06/13/2011 3:18:24 AM PDT by SarahPalinForPresident2012 (She's runnin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
President Reagan's Remarks to Harley-Davidson Company Employees in York, Pennsylvania - 5/6/87
7 posted on 06/13/2011 3:21:41 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat
The trade deficit is not the cause of our economic malaise. Protectionism will only make matters worse.

Generally, you are correct. However, specific to China, you are wrong.

A LESSON:

Free trade means floating currencies. If a country imports more than it exports, its currency devalues, which drives the prices of imported goods up.

China does not let its currency float. They peg it to the dollar, which keeps their prices artificially low.

China should be penalized for this.

Other countries that do not do the same should not get penalized.

8 posted on 06/13/2011 3:55:52 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t really understand why we need to penalize any country who sells goods here.

If you notice just about every company is making their products in China. There are Americans who do nothing but arrange these business relationships with the Chinese.

And why do they do this? BECAUSE IT’S CHEAPER TO MAKE THE PRODUCTS THERE IN CHINA THAN HERE.....DUH!!!!

So what would it take to make the same products here cheaper? Reduce the cost to companies. Give them tax breaks...hell have them pay next to no tax...reduce their regulations etc.

I bet you’d have jobs galore, and tons of vacant warehouses and industries thriving again.


9 posted on 06/13/2011 4:47:45 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
If a country imports more than it exports, its currency devalues, which drives the prices of imported goods up.

That is false.

China does not let its currency float. They peg it to the dollar, which keeps their prices artificially low.

This is no longer true. The Yuan is not pegged to the dollar. My wife just returned from a trip to Beijing. The dollar is now worth less. Prices in dollars there have increased there by around 50%. I was expecting to get my usual $50 watch, but now they cost $75.

10 posted on 06/13/2011 6:04:44 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

What is the current Yuan / Dollar rate?

How much different is that, than a year ago in percentage terms?

And what were you doing in Beijing? Arranging imports?


11 posted on 06/13/2011 6:08:21 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Prices in dollar terms in Beijing do not reflect the exchange rate, because the Yuan does not float based on market conditions - the exchange rate is set by the communist government.

10 years ago the Renminbi exchange rate was around 6.7.

Now the exchange rate is 6.5

Meanwhile the dollar / euro rate has swung back and forth almost 50%.


12 posted on 06/13/2011 6:15:43 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Currently, it is roughly 6.5 yuan to the dollar. When I was there 5 years ago, it was 8.25 yuan to the dollar. I don't know what the rate was one year ago. Two years ago, I had someone else pick me up a watch there for $50 from a particular seller.

And no, I am not in the import business.

13 posted on 06/13/2011 6:29:05 AM PDT by Hoodat (Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

OK my memory of the exchange rate then is wrong, but the exchange rate does not float.

Like everything in China it is set by the communist government.

We are selling America’s future to communists. For cheap crap in Walmart.


14 posted on 06/13/2011 6:31:51 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The U.S. economy would likely be $1.5 trillion larger today but for the trade deficits on oil and with Asia over the last 10 years.

Maybe so. But the problem is that government would've spent whatever money that 1.5 trill would have brought in to The Treasury.

And then some.

15 posted on 06/13/2011 6:33:54 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
So what would it take to make the same products here cheaper?

Use prison and child labor. Reduce pay to U.S. workers to make labor compete with Chinese labor...about nine dollars a day should do it.

There is almost 0 tax on capital gains now...what more could the very wealthy want? Someone living off capital gains pays less of a tax percentage then the minimum wage worker. NAFTA did just what Ross Perot said it would do. That big sucking sound you hear is generated by all the hot air blowing in Washington because there are fewer jobs left here to export.

BOHICA

16 posted on 06/13/2011 6:58:09 AM PDT by KDD (When the government boot is on your neck, it matters not whether it is the right boot or the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How does Germany maintain a trade surplus with China without making their citizens live on a bowl of rice and work at 14 as our union folks claim we would have to?

Remember that Trump had those easy sounding solutions, without credible details it’s all just smoke.

Here’s a start, dont sue companies like Boeing for opening up new plants in the USA.


17 posted on 06/13/2011 1:25:51 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat; Erik Latranyi
RE :"China does not let its currency float. They peg it to the dollar, which keeps their prices artificially low...... This is no longer true. The Yuan is not pegged to the dollar. My wife just returned from a trip to Beijing. The dollar is now worth less. Prices in dollars there have increased there by around 50%. I was expecting to get my usual $50 watch, but now they cost $75."

Thanks, we do need a serious debate on this but we dont need more Trump-isms that are designed just to convince voters that there is another free lunch waiting for us.

Trump-ists ignored the fact that uni-lateral trade tariff's made up by a Trump crackpot would just result in trade sanctions on us killing our exports. The devil is in the details and anything that sounds easy is a sure fraud.

18 posted on 06/13/2011 1:40:14 PM PDT by sickoflibs (If you pay zero Federal income taxes, don't say you are paying your 'fair share')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I must be missing where President Palin comes into this article. Sounds more like Trump.

In fact, I believe Duncan Hunter was saying this a few years ago.


19 posted on 06/13/2011 1:41:14 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I must be missing where President Palin comes into this article. Sounds more like Trump.

In fact, I believe Duncan Hunter was saying this a few years ago.


20 posted on 06/13/2011 1:41:39 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson