[Cringing Negativism Network]

I’ll argue what I choose to argue, thank you.

I believe you seem rather more determined in your arguments, than simply one motivated by an intellectual debate.

Frankly you seem to be advocating actively and with an untoward amount of determination, as a termite.

If that isn’t too oblique a reference.

[freedumb2003]

>>I’ll argue what I choose to argue, thank you.<<

Certainly. If I say it is round, you can argue it is purple. Classic forensic theory suggests arguments support a proposition. But I would never suggest to edit your perspective.

>>I believe you seem rather more determined in your arguments, than simply one motivated by an intellectual debate.<<

I made a prediction. It is simple. Gov. Palin won’t run. It says nothing about her qualifications, her reasoning, her perception by the US. Why is such a prediction met with such animosity?

>>Frankly you seem to be advocating actively and with an untoward amount of determination, as a termite.<<

No, I am just baffled by what I am now calling “Reverse PDS.”

>>If that isn’t too oblique a reference.<

No, but I still don’t understand the anger.