>>I’ll argue what I choose to argue, thank you.<<
Certainly. If I say it is round, you can argue it is purple. Classic forensic theory suggests arguments support a proposition. But I would never suggest to edit your perspective.
>>I believe you seem rather more determined in your arguments, than simply one motivated by an intellectual debate.<<
I made a prediction. It is simple. Gov. Palin won’t run. It says nothing about her qualifications, her reasoning, her perception by the US. Why is such a prediction met with such animosity?
>>Frankly you seem to be advocating actively and with an untoward amount of determination, as a termite.<<
No, I am just baffled by what I am now calling “Reverse PDS.”
>>If that isn’t too oblique a reference.<
No, but I still don’t understand the anger.
Well you’re getting no anger from me.
Just opposition. :)
Dismissal. Put downs. Belittling criticism. Naturally.