Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Agree on “do what she’s told..” She supported McLame for Senate and dismisses the Obama Birth Certificate issue....

Don’t give me this, “she had to pay McCain back...” ...Sarah brought many millions to his campaign that would not have happened with any other candidate...thath was payback enough.

I couldn’t believe she would not support J.D. Hayworth and here is McCain’s daughter continuously ripping ...and then her loser daughter.....

We can do better than Ms. Palin folks...no women nominees...remember the definition of a misogynist...it is a man that hates women almost as much as women hate women. No conservative woman - with decent looks can win...the old hags, the jealous b*tches will shred her.


3 posted on 04/03/2011 4:32:17 PM PDT by Tribemike1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tribemike1

Do you guys still get free pizza? What’s the weather like today in Chicago? What’s that job pay?


13 posted on 04/03/2011 4:42:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet ("You cannot invade the US There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1
A nightstick the size of a telephone pole and the muscle to wield it effortlessly.



16 posted on 04/03/2011 4:46:40 PM PDT by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1
I fully agree. There are fundamental differences between men and women that matter. That this even needs to be articulated on a conservative website is ridiculous; it's a conservative axiom. Does it even need to be pointed out that the converse of this is radical feminism?

Differences that, on the whole, make a man more qualified than a woman for this highest office in the land doesn't mean there are not exceptions. Thatcher was an extraordinary leader of Great Britain, with the intestinal fortitude of a man, but she was a rare exception. Yes, there are more qualified men than Palin or Bachmann, but there's now a strange, novel type of "political correctness" in conservatism that makes say so verboten.

34 posted on 04/03/2011 5:17:44 PM PDT by fwdude (The world is sleeping in the dark that the Church just can't fight, 'cause it's asleep in the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1

At least, Tribemike1, you stuck with the issue and gave your reasons why you do not agree with Jesse.

And very good points you made too


35 posted on 04/03/2011 5:19:35 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1

[We can do better than Ms. Palin folks...]

And your great white hope would be?????


36 posted on 04/03/2011 5:22:03 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1

“Agree on “do what she’s told..” She supported McLame for Senate and dismisses the Obama Birth Certificate issue....

Don’t give me this, “she had to pay McCain back...” ...Sarah brought many millions to his campaign that would not have happened with any other candidate...thath was payback enough.”

But she thought he should be president, and campaigned for and with him? Is it harder to be senator than it is to be president? Or should she have announced “I was lying in the campaign, I don’t think anyone should support McCain?”

I’m sorry, this is a 100% bogus issue made up by people who need to justify to themselves whatever stupid reasons they have to dislike Sarah Palin.


49 posted on 04/03/2011 6:00:26 PM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1
...no women nominees..

As a man, I would perfer that a man step up to take care of the woman folk, but sadly, the two most courageous potential candidates are female.

54 posted on 04/03/2011 6:28:09 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1
no women nominees

Agreed.

57 posted on 04/03/2011 6:45:04 PM PDT by FourPeas (James 3:9-10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1
We can do better than Ms. Palin folks...no women nominees...remember the definition of a misogynist...it is a man that hates women almost as much as women hate women.

Wrong. Misogyny is hatred or contempt of women or girls. Misandry is hatred or contempt of men or boys.

Your post is a prime example of misogyny. If Sarah decides to run and in fact win, it will be not because she does what the GOP tells her to do, but rather she will win because the strength of her own convictions will carry her to victory.

62 posted on 04/03/2011 7:20:12 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tribemike1
I couldn’t believe she would not support J.D. Hayworth...

J.D. understood Sarah Palin's endorsement of McCain, and didn't fault her for it.

65 posted on 04/03/2011 8:43:07 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson