How big GOP 2012 field could boil down to three (Governors Romney, Pawlenty & Barbour)

The Christian Science Monitor ^ | March 29, 2011 | Linda Feldmann

[2ndDivisionVet]

Trying to make it easy for Barry?

[laweeks]

I just wish Romney would go away . . . I’m tired of his universal health care and pro-homosexual stand. Run for the democratic nomination, Romney. They’ll love you. Just go away. You gotta’ be the odds on favorite of the dummycrats for the stupid party’s top spot, but we’ve had enough of their choices . . . Dole . . . McLame . . .

[Diogenesis]

THE REAL DEAL: Romney + Pawlenty + Barbor = 37
vs. Madame President with 1547

Click here for HARRY info

[ReneeLynn]

Another stab at chosing our candidate for us.

[KoRn]

Never cared much for Pawlenty. To me, he comes across as a slick talking RINO. I’m afraid that he would be one to say what he needs to say to get elected, and then turn out to be a RINO, making GW Bush look like a Reagan in comparison.

However, I saw him on TV this morning, and he had a dammed good command/grasp of ‘the issues’, and had a good conservative approach with his answers. Being it was in hostile territory on PMSNBC, it was a very good appearance for him.

[ken21]

i’m not voting for any of these.

[reasonisfaith]

Not voting for them.

[NTHockey]

No Palin, no vote.

GOP headed towards Whig grave.

[95B30]

Wish list for the left!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

State-run media trying to pick the GOP nominee for us again.

[dalereed]

If that happens, i’ll not be casting a vote for President!

[samtheman]

Romney, Pawlenty & Barbour... an MSM wet dream.

[ken21]

yes.

[Luke21]

Christian Science Monitor smells just like Asspress, MSNBC, and the other liars.

[Emperor Palpatine]

Ph please! Willard, Tiny Tim, and Foghorn Leghorn.



What a choice! Maybe I'll stay home and get drunk on election day.

[BobL]

“How big GOP 2012 field could boil down to three (Governors Romney, Pawlenty & Barbour)”

LOL.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Larry, Curly and Mo.

[ModelBreaker]

What a sorry bunch that would be.

[meadsjn]

Romney, Pawlenty & Barbour... an MSM wet dream.

April Fools?

[Charles Henrickson]

I have no idea yet whom I will support for the nomination. I want someone who is conservative, competent, and electable.

Conservative: A "three-legged stool" conservative (fiscal, social, military), someone who "gets" and can articulate Tenth-Amendment federalism.

Competent: Someone who will govern effectively.

Electable: Someone who can appeal to enough voters "in the middle" so as to beat Obama in the general election.

Up to this point, none of the names mentioned "jumps out at me" as the obvious and outstanding choice on all of the above points. We'll see. That's why we have campaigns and primaries.