Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coulter: Sarah Palin shouldn’t run for President (Mark Levin endorses Gov. Sarah Palin!!)
Politicons ^ | February 18, 2011 | Henry D'Andrea

Posted on 02/18/2011 9:39:36 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Ann Coulter said Sarah Palin shouldn’t run for President, and in recent weeks Coulter has been in huge favor of Gov. Chris Christie running for President. Ann Coulter believes that if Christie doesn’t run for President, Mitt Romney will win the Nomination and lose to Obama.

“I especially love her for her enemies, I’m insanely jealous of that,” Coulter said. “I love her for how she makes liberal heads explode. I think it would be a step down for her to run for president,” Coulter said, adding that she admires Palin. “She’s huge. She has enormous power. She sends out a Twitter on death panels and everyone’s talking about it.”

“I think it would be crazy for her to run for president”

Ann Coulter even received some criticism from Conservative Talk Show host Mark Levin. “When will my dear friend Ann start to address the substantive problems with Christie’s actual positions or are we going to get another year of “only Christie can win” fortune cookie logic,” said Levin.

I completely disagree with Ann Coulter, she’s underestimating Sarah Palin. While I respect and admire Coulter, she’s wrong about Palin. Sarah Palin is the only true candidate that we need for President. Republicans can not nominate another establishment Republican. We need a Tea Party candidate, such as Palin or Bachmann.


TOPICS: New Jersey; Campaign News; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2012; anncoulter; bachmann; chrischristie; democrats; freepressforpalin; lindsaylohan; marklevin; palin; sarahpalin; talkradio; teaparty; teapartysucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: sargon

Coulter is not a sincere conservative.


61 posted on 02/19/2011 8:25:24 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33

“Palin has no shot”

But Coulter opposes Palin running because it would “be a step down for her.”

Comes down to: Coulter’s argument against Palin running is incoherent.


62 posted on 02/19/2011 8:27:56 PM PST by reasonisfaith (Relativism is the intellectual death knell of progressive ideology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think it would be a step down for her to run for president

Wow, I don't think I want what Ann Coulter is smoking....since she is clearly off to la-la land!
63 posted on 02/20/2011 12:24:32 AM PST by kroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
I think he's right, if you think reflect that an "annalist" is the same thing as "historian"...

Wink, nudge.

Cheers!

64 posted on 02/20/2011 12:38:57 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Nothing experimental about Palin: unlike Obama, she loves America.

And unlike Obama, she knows her own limitations and will choose solid advisors, not Marxist ideologues.

Nice try, though.

65 posted on 02/20/2011 12:41:25 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: winstonwolf33
Hi, troll-boy.

Maybe you haven't noticed, but numbers among the mushy-headed are fickle.

Obama's ratings shot up after Tucson, and have now fallen back to their accustomed abysmal state.

Do you really think the Madison antics (coupled with Jersey, coupled with New York, and together with whatever shenanigans the SEIU will pull off in the near future), together with $5.00/gallon gas, will make Sarah Palin *LESS* attractive?

I mean, I know the $17.00/hour paid to union thugs in Wisconsin looks good to you right now from your mother's basement, but trust me, this is America. With a natural-born citizen in the White House and a Tea-party filled House and Senate, you can do a *whole* lot better than that.

Vote for Sarah in 2012 and you'll get to experience it for yourself.

BTW, you do have your GED, right?

Cheers!

66 posted on 02/20/2011 12:46:08 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

After having a failed 40-something president who had minimal experience, I think America is going to want a different type next time. In fact, if the two major parties make it Obama v Palin, I expect a serious 3rd party challenge.


67 posted on 02/20/2011 4:14:09 PM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Don't tip your hand too early, Mitt.

Or is it György?

Cheers!

68 posted on 02/20/2011 4:30:29 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Don't tip your hand too early, Mitt.

Or is it György?

Cheers!

69 posted on 02/20/2011 4:30:34 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

He has got to do that. If he does, then he can think about jumping in.


70 posted on 03/04/2011 11:13:56 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Friendofgeorge

What strikes me is that since she regained her feet with the debate with Biden she has not wobbled. Obviously she is a quick study and she has been doing the cramming that the snobs urged on her in 2009. She has good instincts and gobs of guts. But events will determine the outcomes. I look forward to the May “debates.”


71 posted on 03/04/2011 11:19:12 PM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

If he succeeds, he’d win in a walk, I think.


72 posted on 03/04/2011 11:34:43 PM PST by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Unless he blunders as Daniels has. The attempt to separate social conservative from economic ones is a mistaken strategy, as Phil Gramm found out. Phil’s problem was that his opposition to social liberalism lacked any real conviction. The same seems true of Daniels.


73 posted on 03/05/2011 12:24:26 AM PST by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson