Skip to comments.
Mitt Romney Supporters Working To Paint Him As The Anti-Palin
The Huffington Post
| February 11, 2011
| Sam Stein
Posted on 02/11/2011 3:00:04 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Link only, due to copyright issues: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/11/mitt-romney-supporters-anti-sarah-palin_n_821957.html
TOPICS: Massachusetts; Campaign News; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2012; cpac; freepressforpalin; fudgepac; massachusetts; palin; romney; romney4romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
To: fedupjohn
41
posted on
02/11/2011 4:25:13 PM PST
by
fedupjohn
("They act like permanent residents of a unicorn ranch in fantasy land"....Sarah Palin 2012)
To: The Comedian
Palin couldn’t ask for a better endorsement than people saying she’s not at all like flipper.
42
posted on
02/11/2011 4:30:24 PM PST
by
pissant
((Bachmann 2012 - Freepmail to get on/off PING list))
To: TribalPrincess2U
Yes he is. If they intend to run Romney or the Huckster then we have lost 2012 already.
43
posted on
02/11/2011 4:33:02 PM PST
by
jmacusa
(Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
To: nascarnation
You may be right but I could envision Olberman and Soros pushing the Dem Operation Chaos HARD for Romney.
Olberman is on the Al Gore network. He is effectively marginalized. Chris Matthews has more of an audience. Dems mobilize differently than we do. Their operations will be through teachers' unions, homo agitprop groups, etc.
They are good at making noise, less so at coordinating a counter-intuitive big voter turnout. Half of the 5% who voted for Nader because Gore was insufficiently progressive would not be able to get themselves to vote for Romney, even as a joke.
I also don't think the Dem machines in the big cities will get involved in rigging a Republican primary election, the payoff is way too indirect, and not worth the effort.
44
posted on
02/11/2011 4:34:39 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Maybe he’s the anti-Christ?
No, sorry Mitt. Obama already has that one locked up.
45
posted on
02/11/2011 5:03:52 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
as the anti Palin, he is doomed.
46
posted on
02/11/2011 5:04:10 PM PST
by
The Wizard
(Madam President is my President now and in the future)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s already painted himself as a clown.
47
posted on
02/11/2011 5:08:31 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: marron
He can only be a reactionary, He certainly isn’t, ever, going to be responsive.
48
posted on
02/11/2011 5:10:40 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: trisham
Thought my post was self-explanatory. Palin supporters want to paint Romney as the anti-Palin as well.
49
posted on
02/11/2011 5:11:23 PM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: trisham
That’s the way Mitt won his gubernatorial and general in MA: he ran against female candidates whom he painted as complete, stereotypical female ditzes. I’m pretty sure it will backfire if his team continues to be so overt about it with Palin—which I’m sure is why they’ve generally been trying to bury their tracks.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s anti Palin?
Geeze, that’s great.
I was hoping he would be anti MuBarak but, I’ll settle for his opposition to a woman who has been speaking against the administration ass opposed to spending the last two years speaking against ...?????
Moreover, his vision has been so explicit...????
51
posted on
02/11/2011 5:16:50 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Are you working with/for Pissant? LOL
Just kidding.
52
posted on
02/11/2011 5:18:38 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: The Comedian
53
posted on
02/11/2011 5:20:33 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously..... You won't live through it anyway.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Mitt Romney (hiding somewhere):
Now that my attacks on Gov. Palin
and her little children are lauded by CPAC,
and my Romneycare (funded 60% by US taxpayers)
is being pushed by my chosen (RINO) Republicans,
and all the Democrats and Marxists,
a little self examination is in order.
You may want to ask yourself 'if I had spent my time promoting
RomneyCare and Mitt Romney,
and a little time attacking that witch Palin
and her helpless babies during Election2008, could not
I have today garnered more support
of both Obama and Romney?'.
Now you watch and listen as my vicious Team attacks
while you all go play with your little bananas.
54
posted on
02/12/2011 3:51:09 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Tanniker Smith
“Palin supporters”? Unlike you?
55
posted on
02/12/2011 6:14:01 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: 9YearLurker
Yes. It’s going to be more difficult for him this time around, because Sarah has much more experience dealing with underhanded, unprincipled people like him. I wouldn’t be surprised, though, if he’s in it to the bitter end. No matter what it costs.
56
posted on
02/12/2011 6:17:15 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson