Posted on 01/11/2011 5:45:54 AM PST by donjuanluis07
On January 14, this Friday, the leadership of the Republican National Committee will vote on who will be the new chairman. Michael Steele has been one of the most ineffective and damaging chairmen that the Republican party has allowed to lead its chief fundraising organization in recent history. His chairmanship includes:
(Excerpt) Read more at rinolist.org ...
VIDEO OF THE MUPPET STEELE AVAILABLE AT BLOG!
Let Steele be a lesson to us all. I seem to remember a lot of people enthusiastic about him as the “conservative” candidate in the last election (is there a way to pull old threads from when he was elected?). Initially I thought he’d do a good job. Then again, when Schwarzenegger was first elected, I thought he’d do a good job too based on his rhetoric about cutting spending.
I thought I had read in an earlier thread that he was already assured to keep the position.
Sure hope I got that wrong!
and pick who? Stick with Steele he is the best of the bunch, IMHO. Did you see the debate????
“My record stands for itself. We won,” current chair Michael Steele said. "And the fact that we’re standing here right now celebrating that Nov 2 win says a lot about the record.”
Steele is a damned phony----referencing the Repubs win on Nov 2---as if he was the one who made it happen. We all know Tea Partiers told him, before Midterms, to shut up and do nothing so that the Tea Party could do its work.
Steele is a Rino and kowtows to RNC squatters intent on kicking conservatives to the curb. Steele once said "abortion was an “individual choice” (though, he, himself---a Catholic---is (gag) personally pro-life).
"Abortion is an individual choice” is the RINO's most nauseating phrase. Their infamous "let's kick Repub conservatives to the curb" ploy.
===================================
Wannabe Saul Anuzis is a Lithuanian American----born here----who is currently an advisor to the Republic of Lithuania.
We don’t want a hyphenate using the Party to advance the interests of a foreign govt. NO hyphenates, NO way. We want an all-American conservative RNC chair, who salutes the US flag, and bows only to the Constitution of the United States.
Anuzis' biggest claim to fame-----of which he has boasted proudly and endlessly in public forums----that as Michigan GOP chair, he personally forced state and local party organizations to stage "Juneteenth" celebrations. We don't need at the helm of the party someone like Anuzis who diminishes all-American holidays like Independence Day.
ping
Yep he needs to go..
Is that what the RNC is ? A debating society?
I thought it was an organization that raises money to give to candidates, and helps get out the vote. The chairman should do his job and keep his mouth shut. Any one of three other people currently running, including the current front runner, would do a much better job than Steele has done.
he (Saul Anuzis) personally forced state and local party organizations to stage "Juneteenth" celebrations.
Now THAT alone should disqualify him from ANY office/position of leadership - anywhere.
Except maybe for the NAACP.
It sounds like he'd fit right in with those race hustling, reparation pimps.
Yeah lets replace him with Romney...
do I really need the /s ???
Probably has a deal with the race-baiters to infiltrate the RNC, and use the org as a money laundry to get million$$ to them.
(Saul Anuzis) Probably has a deal with the race-baiters to infiltrate the RNC, and use the org as a money laundry to get million$$ to them.
I wouldn't doubt it, after all he's a neo-con. And we know how their minds work, i.e.: Richard Perle, Doug Feith, etc. and their 'what's in it for me' thinking.
That's why I don't fully trust 'über conservative' Eric Cantor. He gives some very nice sound bites, but then when the mics and cameras are off, he's cuddling up to the rats.
Yes in 2009 his ACU rating was 100 but in 2008 it was a 92, so he strayed on something. Plus those ratings are based on only 25 Votes the ACU takes a position on. Not other Bills or what deals are made behind the curtain (like McCain and his Terrorist Protection Bill. That never hit ACU's radar).
Ergo, there's nothing that can convince me that Anuzis is fit to be Chairman of the RNC. To me he's just another neo-con with ulterior motives whose looking out for himself.
Be back in a while. My pc is acting hinky.
Gotta reboot and run a Registry scan.
The thing is, none of the alternatives are anything to brag about.
Saul Anuzis is a friggin neo-con——and the POS is keeping it damned quiet.
The pukeneos detest conservatives.
We need to Anuzis’ emails, cell phone records, snail mails and Blackberry to see when Anuzis gets his orders.
Perle must need more US treasure for his Mideast oil business (gag).
How many more dead and injured US soldiers do these pukes intend to use for their self-serving gains?
Steele is the cream of that putrid crop. Thanks for the info. I will be calling to keep Steele pronto!
EXCERPT-----The Decline and Fall of American Conservatism
The “art of government,” writes neocon frontman William Kristol (Fox talking head and McCain handler), is to translate the “liberal or radical impulse into enduring institutions,” which in a constitutional republic means that neocons want socialist ends to be achieved with conservative means. Now here's the neocon methodology in brief: neocon advice to the Republican Party is to compromise and accept the moral ends of liberal-socialism, but with the caveat that conservatives can do a better job of doling out the goods and services.
Note well who neocons demand compromise from: Conservatives are being asked to compromise THEIR principles. Liberals are being asked ONLY to compromise the manner in which welfare is delivered.
Neocons' moral appeasement serves to embolden the Left........a lesson conservatives need to learn posthaste. Conservatives need to grasp that compromising one principle inevitably leads to hundreds of compromises.
N/C'S SECRET AGENDA? In the neocon-driven conservative relationship, liberalism will always have the upper hand and will always dictate the future. Having abandoned principles, neoconservatives can offer no principled opposition to the creation of new welfare programs in the future. Of course, they would see this as a problem only if they opposed welfare programs, which they do not.
In addition to the Roosevelts----TR and FDR----neocons add Bismarck to their list of statesman-like heroes. According to arch-neocon William Kristol, the “idea of a welfare state is in itself perfectly consistent with a conservative political philosophy—as Bismarck knew, a hundred years ago.”
Neocons’ squat in the Republican Party to restore not a Jeffersonian model of government, but rather the Prussian welfare state. This, according to the neocons, this is what it means to be “in the ‘American grain.’” This is their contribution to what they consider is Republicanism, “the stupid party” as they call it.........and to the American way of life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.