Posted on 11/24/2010 12:54:47 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The problem with the bush family is they have way too many liberals in it.
Isnt Salon a liberal website ???
I can understand why they would like the liberal Romney...
Romney hasnt a hope of beating the DEemocrat nominee...
even if its Barry again...
A ballot like that wouldnt have a choice...
Barry Soetoro V Barry Soetoro 15 years older...
That pretty much sums it up better than anything I've seen written on the topic.
Much to the chagrin of one extreme that sees Mitt as the second coming of Ronald Reagan and the other extreme that sees him as the devil himself.
Or Mormon Barry vs. Islamic Barry.
“I think the majority of Americans don’t want to put up with the blue bloods,”
I just love the way Sarah cuts to the chase and kneecaps little old harmless ladies like Babs Bush. I hope she runs.
ROFLMBO
You mean a little old harmless lady who had just yielded a switchblade? Babs hasn't said anything intelligent since she correctly described Hillary.
Michael Medved seemed to have kicked off his official Mitt Romney in 2012 campaign today, which naturally involved a selling of the Mormon religion at the same time, his anti-Palin campaign has been running for a long time.
Romney support will necessarily, often involve the selling of Mormonism to Christian Republicans it seems, so this primary effort by Romney will be harmful, in way that no other candidate’s campaign has ever been.
I think it’s funny that SP trashes the blue bloods considering: “Sarah Palin is upper echelon when it comes to descent from the nation’s colonial era founding families in New England.”
Read more at Suite101: Sarah Palin’s Ancestry: Solid New England: Vice Presidential Candidate Has Multiple Mayflower Lineages http://www.suite101.com/content/sarah-palins-ancestry-solid-new-england-a67281#ixzz16Egx6OIg
Barbara should know all about *blue-bloods*
http://www.modernhistoryproject.org/mhp/ArticleDisplay.php?Article=BushBook&Entity=BushPS
Wow. A decent realistic piece of analysis from Salon.
Myth will give you red..unless you want blue...then he’ll give you red/blue until he figures out what you really want. Purple? Can do. Orange? Comin’ right up. I love Crist. Green? Let me check...got it. Black? Sure, I love the night. White? Yeah, but don’t be too racist. Pink? Oh, yeah, baby.
That comment by Palin was a touch of genius, putting a shot over the bows of not only the Bush family but the Pubbie establishment.
They can be marginalized as the ‘blue blood’ elites against the average guy Republicans from now on. I don’t know if Palin is the ONe, but she put her finger on a political sore spot with aplomb. That shows guts and political acumen from someone.
In the past conservatives have often given “moderates” the benefit of the doubt.
Those days are done for two reasons. First, we’ve been burnt. And second, there is a lot less room for error now; we are too close to the buzz saw. Compromise got us here and we don’t have that luxury anymore.
When you compromise with someone who is going the wrong direction, you don’t wind up in “sort-of” the right place; you wind up in the wrong place at a slower pace. We are in the wrong place and our time is running out.
The Harvard/Yale boys who have been ruling America since Jan. 1989 have wrecked this country and gotten us $15 trillion in debt.
How could Palin do worse?
>Those days are done for two reasons. First, weve been burnt. And second, there is a lot less room for error now; we are too close to the buzz saw. Compromise got us here and we dont have that luxury anymore.
I’ll add a 3rd reason. We’ve shown we can WIN with real, solid conservatives. We don’t have to settle for old establishment RINOs.
Good point!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.