Posted on 11/23/2010 11:46:17 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
A journalist yesterday asked me a thought-provoking question:
Why does Sarah Palin command so much media attention? By most measures, she currently stands about equal in the Republican field alongside Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and only a little ahead of Newt Gingrich. Yet the cable shows do not erupt when Mitt Romney makes a speech. Newt Gingrich is on Twitter almost every day, but his messages dont make news. So why Palin? Five guesses.
1) She polarizes.
Modern media culture favors contrast and conflict. Sarah Palin serves both up by the bucketful. Most presidential candidates present themselves as gracious and good-natured. Even fierce Hillary Clinton worked hard always to be seen smiling and nodding. Palin is a ferocious hater, and she doesnt care who knows it. Its like the meanest girl on the cheerleading squad running for student council president. Who wouldnt be mesmerized by that?
2) She surprises.
Media people have certain beliefs and expectations about how politics works. Palin regularly confounds those expectations. From the Katie Couric interview through her resignation as governor of Alaska to the reality show: actions that the pundit class expected would ruin her career in fact seem to have somehow enhanced it. They call it news for a reason, and Palin is new.
3) She reveals herself.
We live in a confessional culture these days. Most politicians shy away from confession. They want to talk about economics or foreign policy or abortion or some other impersonal concern. Not Palin! Her topic is herself: her grievances, her complaints, her family. People find compulsive self-revelation riveting in Hollywood stars why wouldnt they find it equally fascinating in a politician?
4) She talks unlike a politician...
(Excerpt) Read more at fullcomment.nationalpost.com ...
LOL! Frum swings “her” purse?
Lordy...I think that is my new favorite! ;o)
I love the “Rove grouses” part, too.
You know you’ve been effective when Rove accuses you of whining. lol
I quite agree with you on Palin, and on this issue in particular. I'd really like to see some documentation of how she has been more of a "hater" than other pols.
The only way I can see this applying is the standard definition of conservative positions as "hate."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.