Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Sarah Palin falls in a forest? [Older Lefty womyn attacking Sarah, defending Moochelle]
Salon ^ | October 16, 2010 | Joan Walsh, Editor-in-Chief

Posted on 10/16/2010 5:35:52 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

It's strange to be aware that Sarah Palin is in California and no one I know seems to care much about it. Sure, my crowd is mostly Democrats, but I'm also thinking about GOP senate candidate Carly Fiorina and our would-be governor Meg Whitman. Both said they had other engagements this weekend -- they're washing their hair? -- and that's particularly hurtful coming from Fiorina. Palin's May endorsement helped shore up the former HP CEO's standing with party right-wingers, since Fiorina was a McCain surrogate in the state, and a real Tea Party candidate, Chuck DeVore, was in the race.

But Fiorina told reporters she wouldn't be with Palin this weekend: "There are lots of people who've endorsed me that I don't appear with." Wow, that's worse than Alaska GOP Senate candidate Joe Miller's diss of Palin. I think Fiorina should expect some nasty mis-spelled email from Todd Palin, if not a moose-head in her bed.

Palin doesn't seem chastened by the failure of her party's contenders to bask in her political glow. She's having a party, mocking President Obama, Katie Couric, Democrats generally, and most repugnantly, Michelle Obama. At her San Jose event she played off the First Lady's much maligned (and misunderstood) statement, "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country, because it seems hope is making a comeback." Palin said, with her trademark tortured syntax: "You know when I hear people say or had said during the campaign that they've never been proud of America until that time I think haven't they met anyone in uniform yet?"

Of course that's not what Michelle Obama said, but beyond that typical Palin mangling of the truth, let's examine the utter classlessness of her remarks. She's a leading if undeclared contender for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012; in many ways comparable to Sen. Barack Obama in 2006. Can anyone imagine Obama mocking Laura Bush for something she might have said on the campaign trail two years earlier? Of course not. But there's no bottom when it comes to what Republicans, especially Palin, will say about the Obamas. There are new rules, folks.

In Sacramento, Palin attacked Obama for raising questions about whether foreign donors to the pro-GOP U.S. Chamber of Commerce are influencing American elections. "If you believe in commerce and you're called a chamber, maybe that's enough to get you on the White House enemy watch list," Palin complained, adding: "Did you ever think our White House would go to war with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce? The Chamber of Commerce isn't a threat...Who are they going to go after next? The Boy Scouts? The Girl Scouts?...The way the White House talks, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is an international terrorist."

But it's clear why Whitman and Fiorina shunned Palin: More than half of California voters in last week's Field Poll -- and two-thirds of independents -- said Palin's endorsing a candidate would make them less inclined to vote for that candidate. A larger proportion of Californians say Palin's not qualified to be president, and yet the state's right-wing faithful could be crucial to a Palin presidential run, with both money and primary votes.

Against this backdrop of Palin's self-interested electioneering, we see a trailer for her new reality show, "Sarah Palin's Alaska." Depicting Palin on a dogsled, a snow-hike and cradling her son Trig, the show purports to prove that Palin doesn't want to be in Golden State, she wants to be in her own state. "I'd rather be doin' this than be in some stuffy political office. I'd rather be out there bein' free." Why doesn't she do us all a favor and just do that? Because she can earn a lot more money in the lower 48. What a hoax she is.

I discussed Palin's California tour on MSNBC's Hardball today with Chris Matthews and John Heileman:

(VIDEO AT LINK)


TOPICS: California; Campaign News; Parties; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2010; ca2010; california; fiorina; megwhitman; palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Jealous much?
1 posted on 10/16/2010 5:35:58 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And Nancy Pelosi???


2 posted on 10/16/2010 5:37:59 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I live in CA and I don’t get it either.


3 posted on 10/16/2010 5:39:15 PM PDT by barbarianbabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

“If you believe in commerce and you’re called a chamber, maybe that’s enough to get you on the White House enemy watch list,” Palin complained, adding: “Did you ever think our White House would go to war with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce? The Chamber of Commerce isn’t a threat...Who are they going to go after next? The Boy Scouts? The Girl Scouts?...The way the White House talks, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is an international terrorist.” Palin


4 posted on 10/16/2010 5:40:01 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Michelle Obama fell in a forest there would be a memorable thud.


5 posted on 10/16/2010 5:40:43 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
the First Lady's much maligned (and misunderstood) statement, "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country, because it seems hope is making a comeback."

This is the second time in as many days that I've read an opinion piece claiming that Michelle's statement is widely misunderstood. In both instances, the authors fail to explain the 'correct' context of the quote.

Is there an official lefty 'correct' context to this quote, or is the Joe Biden-esque "you'd be too stupid to understand it, you dullest audience I've ever seen" sufficient reproach?
6 posted on 10/16/2010 5:41:31 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Carbon Dioxide is plant food, not pollution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup

“They” have been after the Boy Scouts for close to two decades, and appear to have already coopted the Girl Scouts.


7 posted on 10/16/2010 5:42:27 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Joan Walsh = PDS on steroids. Happy 11/2, Joan.
8 posted on 10/16/2010 5:42:44 PM PDT by JPG (Sarah Palin says: "Buck-up or get out of the truck.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The fact that the left always attacks Palin yet never goes after other potential 2012 GOP contenders shows whom they really fear.
9 posted on 10/16/2010 5:44:06 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
It is called the Michelle{ doctrine and only SAM Donaldson knows the correct answer.
10 posted on 10/16/2010 5:45:08 PM PDT by lag along
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I discussed Palin's California tour on MSNBC's Hardball today with Chris Matthews

Good idea. Whenever you want to expose someone as an out-of-touch political hack with an ideological agenda, you should definitely do it on Hardball with Chris Matthews.
11 posted on 10/16/2010 5:45:19 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Carbon Dioxide is plant food, not pollution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Can anyone imagine Obama mocking Laura Bush for something she might have said on the campaign trail two years earlier?

You mean like when Nancy Reagan said 'Just Say No To Drugs' and everyone on the left refrained from poking gentle fun at her?
12 posted on 10/16/2010 5:47:52 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Carbon Dioxide is plant food, not pollution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Joan Walsh is a bitter old Stalinist.


13 posted on 10/16/2010 5:52:31 PM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Joan Walsh! ROTFL!!!!!!


14 posted on 10/16/2010 5:54:28 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Public Servants Gone Wild".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221
The fact that the left always attacks Palin yet never goes after other potential 2012 GOP contenders shows whom they really fear.

The derangement syndrome seems to apply to all conservative women, even down to the beauty queen level. Remember that Miss California contestant who honestly answered a question about gay marriage and was pilloried by the media.

The long knives are also out for Michelle Bachman, Jan Brewer, Meg Whitman, Carly Fiorina, etc.
15 posted on 10/16/2010 5:56:29 PM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Carbon Dioxide is plant food, not pollution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There is a post on c4p that says Walsh admitted lying about Sarah.


16 posted on 10/16/2010 5:57:19 PM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Sure, my crowd is mostly Democrats,"

That's an understatement...
17 posted on 10/16/2010 5:58:53 PM PDT by liberty75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What a load of New York Times.


18 posted on 10/16/2010 6:03:03 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She's [Sarah Palin] having a party, mocking President Obama, Katie Couric, Democrats generally, and most repugnantly, Michelle Obama.

You mean the unindicted Class A Misdemeanor criminal Michelle Obama, don't you, Joan?

In Illinois, for instance, list of Class A misdemeanors includes endangering a child’s welfare, some forms of assault (battery), engaging in prostitution or soliciting a prostitute, possession of firearms, reckless driving and driving under the influence.

So, Moochelle is like a drunk driver, illegal gun carrier, child neglecter, violent assaulter, or a sex-for-munney girl.

I'd say that's pretty repugnant.

19 posted on 10/16/2010 6:03:33 PM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

It’s always private citizen Sarah they go after - yep, it’s her they fear. The Tea Party and Sarah.


20 posted on 10/16/2010 6:07:21 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson