Did she go to the premier of “Wall St 2, Money Never Sleeps”?
And another day goes by where the left does not try to sell its agenda.
Waste those days, Democrats!
From a scientific perspective, it's a legitimate question. If selective pressure favors the development of a specific evolutionary lineage, why do the ‘less fit’ members of this lineage persist? There are answers to that question, but her question was not a ‘stupid’ one.
rules!
You mean Moron Dudd STILL has a job???
Maher and Dowd. Now there’s a pair for you. Talk about a couple of slouches.
Let’s be honest. Bill Maher and Mo Dowd trying to discuss science like they know what they’re talking about are evidence that Christine O’Donnell might have a point.
bookmark this site for info on elections who’s who, whats what.
http://electoral-vote.com/
This posting buries the lead. In the piece, Dodd writes, “President Obama was supposed to be a giant leap forward in modernity, the brainy, rational first black president leading us out of the scientific darkness of the W. years. But by letting nutters get a foothold, he may usher us into the past.”
Dodd and other NAZIonale Socialists are saying that the big
Lib should disallow “nutters” like O’Donnell from getting a
foothold. This would be by means of... suspending free elections? Being even more leftist to be even more popular?
Mind boggling that Dodd thinks that 0bama even has some say
about who “gets a foothold,” and boggling that Dodd’s still so elitist that she thinks once a “nutter” gets a foothold, the stupid masses will just follow along.
“Christine O’Donnell doesn’t understand why monkeys can’t turn into people right before her eyes”
And you don’t understand how they can turn into people over a long period of time. You can’t understand it, because nobody can.
It’s never been described rationally.
That's pretty lame, but I'd still vote for her if I lived in Delaware.
In 2007, O’Donnell frantically warned Bill O’Reilly, “American scientific companies are crossbreeding humans and animals and coming up with mice with fully functioning human brains.”
I hope Dowd is making this up.
In proclaiming O’Donnell to be “stupid,” these people are inevitably bringing themselves closer to that realm known as foolishness.
Because the evolutionists ultimately have no rational basis. Dowd and Maher are standing on faith—faith in biologists.
I don’t care what her views are on evolution, and I don’t think DE voters will care either.
Who is the socialist, Coons or O’Donnell?
Who will work to free us from the chains of ReidPelosiObama socialism, Coons or O’Donnell.
All the rest is irrelevant.
I don’t care what her views are on evolution, and I don’t think DE voters will care either.
Who is the socialist, Coons or O’Donnell?
Who will work to free us from the chains of ReidPelosiObama socialism, Coons or O’Donnell.
All the rest is irrelevant.
Is this true?
“O’Donnell’s numbers are dropping, while Castle is still beating the Democratic candidate, Chris Coons, by almost 20 points in a theoretical matchup.”
Whether it’s true or not, anyone who says that there’s no difference between Coons and Castle is too ignorant to vote.
Liberals think they’re so smart...but don’t notice that their idea of Darwinism contains circular logic.....
turns a verb into a noun and makes “evolution” into a god, ie an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent force......
plus...they can’t explain the contradiction between believing in “love” and collectivist belief that we are “human beings” who have RIGHTS and are “ONE”, against the Darwinistic belief of survival of the fittest, ie people as homo sapien individuals whose purpose in life is to survive and mate to pass on personal genes.....
“Humanity” is a concept........concepts are mental and not physical......
Nor are there any “rights” in the physical/material world.....rights are conceptual as well......
So why do liberals believe that “rights” exist but not Gods or things beyond the physcial senses...
These people also talk about REASON as if reason were not a limited mental faculty.......
He might well review what he said in 2005 and 2008 ~ interesting stuff fur shur ~ not quite in synch with what he told Maureen.
Frankly, many people suspect that maureen's brain was replaced with a mouse brain quite some time ago. The fact she didn't fully research the subject may well be evidence of that suspicion being correct.