Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This posting buries the lead. In the piece, Dodd writes, “President Obama was supposed to be a giant leap forward in modernity, the brainy, rational first black president leading us out of the scientific darkness of the W. years. But by letting nutters get a foothold, he may usher us into the past.”

Dodd and other NAZIonale Socialists are saying that the big
Lib should disallow “nutters” like O’Donnell from getting a
foothold. This would be by means of... suspending free elections? Being even more leftist to be even more popular?

Mind boggling that Dodd thinks that 0bama even has some say
about who “gets a foothold,” and boggling that Dodd’s still so elitist that she thinks once a “nutter” gets a foothold, the stupid masses will just follow along.


20 posted on 09/25/2010 3:41:23 PM PDT by WKTimpco (Traditional Values Counter Revolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WKTimpco
The New York Times is excerpt and link. What would you have me do?
21 posted on 09/25/2010 3:42:39 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Palin/Bolton 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: WKTimpco

Like the “nutters” writing for the New York Times?


24 posted on 09/25/2010 3:43:57 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: WKTimpco

I think she means that Obam0 is so far left that he has allowed the pendulum to swing widely in the other direction.

By the way, she brushes off the possibility of mice having human children as more evidence of O’Donnell’s stupidity. That is an unnerving idea, and O’Donnell was right.


36 posted on 09/25/2010 5:27:02 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson