Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Attempts to Ban Fox News From Interviewing "Pay Czar"; Major News Groups Rebel
The Tusk ^ | 10222009 | R Hargraves

Posted on 10/23/2009 8:23:33 AM PDT by KatyLoraleyVidales

In his on going effort to demonize Fox News Channel, President Barack Obama and his advisers attempted one of the most egregious abuses of executive power in it's short history - and only one of the firsts, no doubt - by attempting to ban Fox News White House correspondent Major Garrett from interviewing one of the mysterious White House "czars". The White House's "war on Fox News" has even involved senior advisers telling other media outlets that they "ought not treat" Fox as a legitimate news organization: White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel told CNN on Sunday that President Obama does not want "the CNNs and the others in the world [to] basically be led in following Fox."

Obama senior adviser David Axelrod went further by calling on media outlets to join the administration in declaring that Fox is "not a news organization."

"Other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way," Axelrod counseled ABC's George Stephanopoulos. "We're not going to treat them that way." George Stephanopoulos, a former Bill Clinton advisor, is one of countless former Democrat aides an officials now working for "legitimate" news organizations as journalists. Chris Matthews of MSNBC is another.

(Excerpt) Read more at russhargraves.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 10/23/2009 8:23:33 AM PDT by KatyLoraleyVidales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

I still dont know how a czarr can do this...enforce policy or law...thought they were advisors


2 posted on 10/23/2009 8:25:58 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

The czars have spoken....

anything in opposition is forbidden, nobody can question the authority and opposition is outlawed.


3 posted on 10/23/2009 8:26:24 AM PDT by himno hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales
Major News Groups Rebel

What the WH doesn't realize is that these Fox reporters, while being mocked by other news groups in public, are privately their friends, most of these media hang out together in private. Even the dolts at MSNBC (besides the obvious boot lickers) understand that if the WH can do this to Fox, they may be next if they accidentally report the same thing. The WH dictating like this removes the power the MSM likes to have. No star power of Zero can overcome their own desire for power.

4 posted on 10/23/2009 8:26:45 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

Check!


5 posted on 10/23/2009 8:27:43 AM PDT by GoCards ("We eat therefore we hunt...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

All your opinions are belong to us!


6 posted on 10/23/2009 8:30:07 AM PDT by CSM (Business is too big too fail... Government is too big to succeed... I am too small to matter...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

I just turned Fox off in disgust... They were talking about this salary capping for banks... The lib guy was argueing that, ‘hey, if the banks continue in these practices that lead us to the collapse...’ -and the Fox people just let it slide.

It makes me sick when they don’t ask the OBVIOUS questions. Like - “wasn’t it the GOVERNMENT who forced these banks to use these questionable practices in the first place?!?!?!”

But no. NOBODY is asking. They just let it slide. Even Fox.


7 posted on 10/23/2009 8:32:05 AM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

8 posted on 10/23/2009 8:32:32 AM PDT by paulycy (Predatory Pricing = Public Option = Unethical Competition .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Even the dolts at MSNBC (besides the obvious boot lickers) understand that if the WH can do this to Fox, they may be next if they accidentally report the same thing. The WH dictating like this removes the power the MSM likes to have. No star power of Zero can overcome their own desire for power.

I think the MSM wants to be Obama's official Pravda. They won't be reporting anything negative about Premier Obama, his Tsars or commissars anyway. Every time he issues a directive for them, they'll get that tingle up their legs.

9 posted on 10/23/2009 8:36:06 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

Title should read OBAMA DIGS DEEPER HOLE.


10 posted on 10/23/2009 8:37:31 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

I disagree, I think they want to control Zero, not the other way around (they just happen to share the same values). They originally thought it would be easy because they share the same values and they can do it with other politicians, but now they are seeing that the WH is stripping power away from their type to the left and right of them, and they worry for their own power.

I doubt they really want to be ‘lap dogs’- they have always had the desire to be the ones holding the leash.


11 posted on 10/23/2009 8:38:28 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Take the next step. If the MSM were to get on board with this, they would essentially be acknowledging that in order to get access to news from the WH, they better be friendly.

From a business perspective, they likely realized that if they would have participated in the media event that excluded Fox, the story from the event would have nothing to do with the interview and be all about the fact that the WH excluded Fox. The competition certainly does not want to have to report the story about their competition and if they didn't report the “story” of exclusion, they would be obviously complicit in cohorts with the WH.

For the rest that refused to conduct interviews excluding Fox, it was a no win situation. While their position assumes a moral high ground and they should be given credit, I believe there was more strategic thought that went into it than what is right and wrong about it.

12 posted on 10/23/2009 8:38:58 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I disagree, I think they want to control Zero, not the other way around (they just happen to share the same values). They originally thought it would be easy because they share the same values and they can do it with other politicians, but now they are seeing that the WH is stripping power away from their type to the left and right of them, and they worry for their own power.

Remember how frustrating it was for us when Republicans were in charge and pushing crap like amnesty and perscription entightlements? We held the house and the senate and our own party was going against the base. Think about how the MSM and the liberal base must feel now that their guy is looking so foolish while accomplishing nothing.

13 posted on 10/23/2009 8:42:20 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Government For the People - an obviously concealed oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

Traveling right now, but caught FOX this morning. It is indeed a story for them but are the networks covering the story, too, or are they burying it?


14 posted on 10/23/2009 8:43:49 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

Does this constitute an Misdemeanor under Article Two, Section 4 for Impeachment viz., breaking oath Article II, Section 1,8.??? [”...preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”


15 posted on 10/23/2009 8:44:15 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 (God bless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

Does this constitute an Misdemeanor under Article Two, Section 4 for Impeachment viz., breaking oath Article II, Section 1,8.??? [”...preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”


16 posted on 10/23/2009 8:46:19 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 (God bless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

I still dont know how a czarr can do this...enforce policy or law...thought they were advisors

That’s why everyone is upset - they can make any decisions they want! Un-American!


17 posted on 10/23/2009 8:47:47 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joethedrummer

You turned out too soon.

The anchor (I forget his name) did make that point, in the form of a question and the GOP representative/strategist elaborated.

They don’t jump down anyone’s throat, usually, on the daytime news shows. They ask gentle questions so that the audience can observe the reaction and the other debater can have a lead in to the point.

Unlike the SRM, FNC just relentlessly and gently keeps on asking the questions that need to be asked.


18 posted on 10/23/2009 8:59:27 AM PDT by reformedliberal (Are we at high crimes or misdemeanors, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales
First they came for Rush Limbaugh and because we weren't a conservative radio talk show, we did nothing.

Then they came for Glenn Beck and because we had no conservative TV talk show hosts, we did nothing.

Then they came for Fox News Network and because we weren't a conservative TV network, we did nothing.

Then they came for us, and there was no one left to do anything to help us.

- signed ABCNBCCBSCNNMSNBC

19 posted on 10/23/2009 9:08:51 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (As government grows, corruption flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KatyLoraleyVidales

If only Il Douche and his Merry Reds moved as quickly in formulating and carrying out a policy against the Taliban as they have against FOX.


20 posted on 10/23/2009 9:15:17 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson