I ordered a copy of my birth certificate from the State of Ohio. The one they sent looks different and “just printed” off a PC, and it’s different than the ones my parents have. However, it’s fully legit, so I can’t say whether or not Obama’s was actually photoshopped.
Check the other threads. The issue isn’t that it’s a document containing data generated from a government database (there’d be nothing wrong with that). The issue is that this is an artisitic creation wholly generated by a photoshop artist. It’s fishy.
I also ordered a copy of my birth certificate from the state of Pennsylvania. It also looks like a computerized form, and not the same as the yellowed certificate my parents had. Is it common for states to have computer databases of all their vital records nowadays? And just print off a statement if someone needs it?
The only real way anybody could tell if it was a photoshop fake is for Obama to either release it to the public which I don’t think would be a very big deal to kill all the speculation or for a HAWAII resident born in 1961 to white out portions of their birth certificate from that year and post it.
Now the copy that has been photo shopped is a certificate that was produced in 2007. The 2007 version was alledged to be from the State of Hawaii vitial records division. We need to get a current copy of a Hawaii certificate to verify if the Obama one was a fake.
So if there are any Hawaian born Freepers Please go to work and clarify this whole issue once and for all.
Each state is different .... Ohio would not be the same. Different paper,format and ink or printer.
A valid birth certificate should have a imprinted, raised seal of the state issuing it. The seal can’t be photo shopped.
“.....and it’s different than the ones my parents have.”
The one your parents have is probably the one that the hospital issued when you were born. Those are not valid for legal use.