Posted on 12/27/2007 11:14:53 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
HARRIS FAULKNER : Senator, your reaction, first, to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
FRED THOMPSON : It is a tragedy, of course. It reminds us that things can happen in faraway places of the world that can affect the United States. I think this should be of great concern to us. It is almost a perfect storm in a very bad sense because two forces are operating against each other that are both desirable. One is democracy: they were making progress in that regard in that country. Former prime minister Bhutto was an important part of that process. But the other is stability. Pakistan is a nuclear country, and we cannot afford to let nukes fall into the hands of dangerous Muslim radicals. We are hoping those two things can be balanced out. We can see the continued progress toward a democratic society but also maintain stability in the country, which seems to be very much in doubt right now.
FAULKNER: I know you are running for the White House, so I don't want to put you in a position to second guess the president. But I'm interested in your opinion. President Bush is due to talk with Pervez Musharraf shortly. What do you anticipate that conversation should be like?
THOMPSON: Those two things that I mention probably would be high on the agenda. What could be done to not impose martial law, to not crack down, but be mindful of the fact that there are radical elements in that country, and perhaps even within the government, that would like to see instability and chaos and see those weapons fall into the wrong hands. This is part of a bigger problem. We need to understand that this is not a criminal investigation any more - so we find the bad guys and bring them to justice - it's a war.
This proves again the mindset of the radical elements that we are dealing with. We are seeing this all across Northern Africa and various places. We're seeing it across the Middle East and in parts of Asia including Indonesia and other places. We have to come to terms with that and do the things necessary to prevail. One of the things we need to be talking about is what Musharraf can do, additionally, to crack down on the Taliban. I think they have been insufficient in that respect.
FAULKNER : Taliban also supporters of al Qaeda in that country. Pakistan has been an important ally in the war on terror, so have do you walk that line?
THOMPSON: You just walk it. No one said it has been easy and simple. Pakistan has never been easy or simple. I had a chance a few years ago to talk to Musharraf before things got quite as complex as they are now. But it has always been an important part of the world. They're next door to India. They've had a crisis after crisis with regard to them. They're next door to Afghanistan, and they're important to us. They've been helpful to us. But we' re going to have to walk that line between democracy on the one hand and stability on the other. But I think it's possible.
Don’t drag Van Halen down with Huckster.
What is he apologizing for ? or about ?
Decent of Fred to go on Fox after the crack they made about him today. I would not have been so civilized.
Not wrong. In wars you kill the bad guys. In criminal investigations you bring them to justice... which could also mean trials. Thompson correctly recognizes this as a war. Where did he say we shouldn’t kill them?
At least Huck wants to go into Pakistan to get bin Laden. Fred said “Bin Laden is more symbolism than anything else.”
Well Fred better start telling voters a little bit more about Fred if he wants to earn their votes. People need to know about his background and experience, and if the candidate doesn’t tell them about it, no one will.
See post #20.
That’s basically what Fred Thompson said, we need to find the bad guys, because this is WAR.
I'd purchase that airline ticket.
Maybe Huckster can be Obama’s running mate then.
Huckabee’s foreign policy know how gives Holiday Inn a bad name.
Off the cuff and unprepared. Outstanding!
It’s not too late for the only across-the-board, consistent conservative to win the nomination. And he’s timing his groove just right.
Just imagine Fred v Hil. It’d be a Reagan-esque landslide.
At least Huck wants to go into Pakistan to get bin Laden.
I’d purchase that airline ticket.
—
I hope he can take his camouflage shotgun with him..
Yes. Killing Bin Laden would be a symbolic vicory. Killing every AQ member, wherever we find them, is a real victory.
Not wrong at all.
Thompson sees 'bigger picture' in Bhutto slaying-'This is a war, a clash of civilizations
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.