Skip to comments.
Why This Evangelical Supports Fred Thompson (MUST READ!)
Red State ^
| October 6, 2007
| Ilja
Posted on 10/06/2007 5:51:00 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well, dang...that’s annoying.
I know rules are rules, and I respect them,
but you’d think something this well written
that speaks to my heart would be in breaking.
It’s all about me. ;o)
21
posted on
10/06/2007 10:14:35 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
(There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
To: Politicalmom; 2ndDivisionVet
"What she said!"
ABSOLUTELY!
Great read...expresses exactly my thoughts.
I've never seen it put so succinctly, and so well.
Thank you ever so much for the ping and post!
22
posted on
10/06/2007 10:18:46 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
(There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
To: WKB; wardaddy; ejonesie22; bkwells; DogwoodSouth; WileyPink; jmax; Islander7; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
Baptist bump!
Why not a Mississippi ping, too? ;o)
23
posted on
10/06/2007 10:20:12 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
(There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
To: All; Sturm Ruger

A MAN WITH "PRINCIPLES CLOSEST TO OUR FOUNDING FATHERS!"
FRED VETS, SIGN UP TODAY AT:
24
posted on
10/07/2007 3:22:33 AM PDT
by
W04Man
(I'm Now With Fred http://Vets4Fred.net)
To: alicewonders
“This is a very, very important point! Unless conservatives want to have to hold their nose to vote for Rudy! - to keep Hillary! from winning - we had better start lining up behind a conservative candidate that can win.”
But I believe that if Rudy were to win the Republican nomination, that Hillary will be our next president. The MSM have obviously chosen Rudy to be our candidate. Why? Because they have tons of bad press to bring out against Rudy and with Hillary having Wesley Clark as her VP to “take care of the war”, the MSM would point out that Hillary/Clark is the best choice for America! We can’t let that happen!
To: seekthetruth
I agree. If Rudy is our nominee - we lose. A vote for Rudy is a vote for Hillary. If we put a conservative in there, we will defeat Hillary.
Now is the time to look at the bigger picture.
26
posted on
10/07/2007 6:08:56 AM PDT
by
alicewonders
(Duncan Hunter needs to be our next Secretary of Defense.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I have a line that I will not cross when it comes to who can earn my vote and that line is someone who thinks it is okay to take the life of an innocent unborn baby. Therefore, Rudy Giuliani will not be getting my vote even if he does end up winning the Republican Presidential nomination. " That's me. While I don't consider myself a one issue voter, I simply cannot vote for a person who supports the killing of unborn children..it speaks to their character, IMHO.
27
posted on
10/07/2007 6:38:50 AM PDT
by
sweet_diane
(Turn off the radio and get back to work Senator Reid.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
FRed will be the Ronald Reagan for the 21st Century:
Thats works for me. I'm thinking he might be the next Lincoln.
28
posted on
10/07/2007 6:53:27 AM PDT
by
painter
(Oval Office, Fred. Might be something you ought to think about.)
To: Always Right
I’m sure that former Agents Compean and Ramos are glad to known that GWB is a “social conservative”.
29
posted on
10/07/2007 6:56:15 AM PDT
by
Theodore R.
( Cowardice is still forever!)
To: seekthetruth
Why? Because they have tons of bad press to bring out against Rudy.
The 2000 election is a case in point. A week before the election it was shaping up to be a landslide win for Bush. The Friday before the DUI story comes out and Bush wins by a couple hundred votes in Florida. Why did that happen? A good chunk of the Christian Right stayed home. (Which made me want to pull my hair out!) Karol Rove even pointed that out himself.
btw..I consider myself part of the Christian Right.
30
posted on
10/07/2007 7:15:01 AM PDT
by
painter
(Oval Office, Fred. Might be something you ought to think about.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I agree completely. Except that givne the choice between Rudy and any Dhimm, I’ll have to hold my nose and swing on the elephant’s tail.
31
posted on
10/07/2007 7:51:31 AM PDT
by
chesley
(Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
To: Theodore R.
Im sure that former Agents Compean and Ramos are glad to known that GWB is a social conservative.,p> Immigration is not a social conservative issue.
To: painter
. I'm thinking he might be the next Lincoln. ugh
33
posted on
10/07/2007 10:10:57 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(Behind the lines in Vichy Nashville)
To: Always Right
No, but gross injustice should concern any social conservative. Actually, though, isn’t winking at illegal immigration a most anti-social conservative policy? Anyway, it will take more than GWB’s “social conservatism” to resell him to me.
34
posted on
10/07/2007 1:13:42 PM PDT
by
Theodore R.
( Cowardice is still forever!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Excellent article....I'm running on 'FRed-Power' myself:
35
posted on
10/07/2007 2:55:27 PM PDT
by
FlashBack
(WoundedWarriorProject.Org/MoveAmericaForward.Org/ProudPatriots.Org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson