Okay, this can't be good. Is it too late for Istook?
To: presidentbowen
Source???
If it is the Tulsa World, you could bet that the numbers were manipulated. The World is worse than the NYT.
2 posted on
03/07/2004 1:50:08 PM PST by
jbstrick
(War is not fought for peace. War is fought for victory.)
To: presidentbowen
This poll was commissioned in mid-January. I don't know where the race stands now. Still, this is one reason that Tom Coburn decided to get into the race.
To: presidentbowen
Oklahoma is a heavily Baptist state, and they tend to vote for other Baptists. While the voters were willing to support the Roman Catholic Don Nickles, there were doubts as to whether they would support a Mormon (which Ernest Istook is).
To: presidentbowen
Old poll. And who needs Istook when Tom Coburn is just what the doctor ordered?
Sorry for the pun. But I'm not kidding about Dr. Coburn; he would eliminate Carson's advantage in NE and SE OKlahoma and win with at least 53%.
9 posted on
03/08/2004 7:22:47 AM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: presidentbowen
two problems here:
Did they over-sample DEM voters?
Also if Carson is leading in TULSA by 20 and rest of state by 20, how is it he is only leading by 11????????
15 posted on
03/08/2004 10:01:39 PM PST by
raloxk
To: presidentbowen
COBURN!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson