[ClearCase_guy]

'It's no longer about science. It's about reputations.'

Isn't it always?

[org.whodat]

'It's no longer about science. It's about reputations.'

Isn't it always?

No it's about all the liberal junk science based upon the big bang.

[Dataman]

That was the quote that caught my eye also.

[Rocky]

What, you mean scientists aren't strictly objective? Hey, maybe we ought to read between the lines with these scientific folks a little more often.

How can truth be advanced if the leaders of the discipline won't admit when they are wrong, but instead make every effort to stomp out any contradictory voices, even going so far as to conceal evidence that doesn't support their own pet theory?