Who should run against Bush in 2004?

Mr. Morals | September 22, 2003 | Mr. Morals

[Mr. Morals]

George w. Bush is a disgrace to our party and our nation.

He should be dumped from the ticket and a REAL Republican should be put in his place. If Bush is the GOP standard bearer in 2004, I will vote for the most conservative third party ticket.

Here's why:

1) Bush supports the assault weapons ban.

2) Bush coddles the environazi agenda.

3) Bush has done NOTHING for the pro-life movement.

4) Bush signed every piece of democrap garbage from when the dems controlled the Senate in 2001.

5) Bush is supporting outright liberals for office (Ahhh-nold Shwarzenegger comes to mind!)

6) Bush supports NAFTA and is a globalist.

I could go on and on..

I urge other fellow conservatives to add to this list and work towards making the GOP a REAL conservative party.

[MEG33]

Gee,I thought you would never get here!!Great ZOT!(How about the TROLL pic?!)

[4mycountry]

Very good! Certainly fits!! Here's another one...

It's kinda hard to find troll pics. Kudos for the drawing! :)

[MEG33]

Rainmaker posted the Troll!I'm getting a red x on your latest...

[cdefreese]

There are more around that feel similar to the way you do. I for one, have been bitting my lip, trying to give Bush the benefit of the doubt.

I will still vote for him for the simple reason of the way he handled 9-11, the war on terrorism, and the tax cuts. On the other hand, I think I can still complain about the corporate welfare, farm bill, education bill, amnesty, growth in govt(with the exception of defense), and not be called a Bush-hater or troll by any kneejerks. But like I said, I am giving him the benefit of the doubt, since the economy is picking back up, hopefully he will come out as a true conservative and not a big-govt moderate after he wins in '04.

[MEG33]

It was the change from May to now set off an alarm.

[murdoog]

Here's a tip: when you already have a screen name that invites ridicule, it is best not to post provocative vanities.

[4mycountry]

That's strange, a lot of pics I post aren't getting through...

(Trial pics, tell me if you can see any of them.)

1.

2.

3.

[MEG33]

I see all 3.

[4mycountry]

I have an idea...tell me if you see any of these correctly:

1.

2.

3.

[MEG33]

1 is a red x,2&3 I see.

[4mycountry]

It seems to be that photos from a certain source that i've had for a certain time don't show up.

But I can see them...weird....

[MEG33]

Good one!

[MEG33]

How true!

[NeoCaveman]

[MeekOneGOP]

Sheesh ! ...

November, 2004:
President Bush on the Road to Victory ...

[MEG33]

Thanks~>>>...;)

[bobjam]

A 2004 Democratic ticket that includes Hillary (even as VP) would be a God-send to Bush. Arch-conservatives would rather put up with another four years of Bushics than have a Clinton-run White House. In reality, Bush is in trouble and he knows it. Why else would he send Ashcroft on the "USA Patriot Act Tour". Certainly not to bring liberals to his side. He sent him in an attempt to shore up his conservative base.

[Coop]

Congratulations! You have vaulted into the lead for the coveted SPOTD award.

[Coop]

In reality, Bush is in trouble and he knows it.

Based on what? The $60+ million he's raised without breaking a sweat? The fact that he leads any and all contenders in national polls? The fact that he's well positioned electorally, including having a 14-vote increase over the 2000 election just from redistricting?

It cracks me up how you say "he knows it." I see a President, and his advisors, who are anything but worried.

[roylene]

Although, I think you are a little over the top about Bush.... Please explian why you would support Tom Tancredo?
I have six brothers and sisters (that doen's include spouses, adult children and on on...) in the Denver area and they think he is a little nuts!