Replies

In other words, its to Rush's benefit to manipulate Dems to greater prominence.

Exactly and the reason he lost me as a listener. The day he started touting an article in the NY Times as fact when it had already been proved to be false by the White House, I started taking a hard look at Rush. I had already quit listening to him every day.

Then when he defended Russert as being non-biased and a good interviewer and dared listeners to prove Russert was biased, I turned him off most days.

Now I refuse to listen to him period! I don't find his humor funny and his continual attacks on Pres Bush and now Arnold have done it in total for me. I may only be one listener but I refuse to believe I am the only one who has hit the Off button on Rush!

He made his millions and now I am sure that he could care less! Truth Detector he is not or he wouldn't use the NY Times for a source!

My two cents!

I keep drifting over to Dennis Prager, who is on at the same time as Rush. Sometimes Rush can be so insightful and make his case against the libs with lots of juicy facts, but I haven't heard a lot of that lately. I change the station on anyone when they start talking about sports.

We stopped listening to Rush here in my office when he started to sound more like a bot than a bot. W may not stink like Clinton, but grandstanding him until he sounds like Reagan is absurd. Instead, one of my mates here has Sean Hannity's show on some sort of computer-delay-thingie I don't understand, and we listen to him every day.