Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cancer patient sues doctors who removed genitals (Penis)- DID NOT HAVE CANCER!
Associated Press ^ | 08/07/03 | Staff Writer

Posted on 08/07/2003 1:38:58 PM PDT by bedolido

WICHITA FALLS -- A mechanic is suing a clinic and two doctors, claiming they removed his penis and testicles without consulting him after they mistakenly thought he had cancer.

Hurshell Ralls, 67, seeks an unspecified amount in his negligence lawsuit filed against the Clinics of North Texas in Wichita Falls, Dr. John Stephen Dryden and Dr. Farid G. Khoury. The civil case is set for trial Aug. 25.

Ralls, who said he had a normal sex life with his wife before the 1999 amputation, said he remains angry with his doctors.

"I don't think they should have played God, myself," Ralls said Wednesday.

The clinic and doctors declined to comment.

Ralls said Dryden started treating him 15 years ago for kidney infections caused by lifelong bladder problems. Since he was in his mid-20s, Ralls said, he has urinated into a bag through a catheter attached to his ureters, the tubes carrying urine from the kidneys to the bladder.

Ralls said he went in for surgery in November 1999 after Dryden said a biopsy showed he had bladder cancer. Dryden and Khoury, who assisted in the surgery, never mentioned that the cancer could be spreading and that they might have to remove other organs, Ralls said.

In a February deposition, Dryden told Ralls' attorneys that while removing Ralls' bladder, he determined the cancer had spread to the penis.

"I was the one looking at it, and I've seen it. I mean, it was cancer," Dryden testified.

He said he did not take tissue samples to test for cancer because "I did not feel, in my medical judgment, that they were worthwhile."

Steve Briley, Ralls' attorney, said tests could have been done in 30 minutes in the same clinic.

Briley said a doctor looking at cell slides later found Ralls did not have penile cancer.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: consulting; mechanic; suing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: bedolido
Just in case nobody posted one yet...


41 posted on 08/08/2003 7:48:50 AM PDT by WestPacSailor (Society is safer when the criminals don't know who is armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestPacSailor
my pathologist husband was speechless that any doc would remove a penis without a proof positive slide showing the cancer and he would get another pathologist to confirm. Horrible horrible case.
42 posted on 08/08/2003 7:51:17 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
What ever happened to patient consent forms? Shouldn't this guy have signed SOMETHING before any kind surgery?
43 posted on 08/08/2003 7:59:07 AM PDT by WestPacSailor (Society is safer when the criminals don't know who is armed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WestPacSailor
You gotta wonder. But those consent forms are so long and such small type, most people don't read them.They all say "this surgery might kill you",,they usually don't mention losing ones penis however but that should have been explained to him.
44 posted on 08/08/2003 9:51:02 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Gee, and lets wonder if the whole $350,000 was offered. No? surprise, surprise, surprise.
45 posted on 08/08/2003 10:10:32 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Killing FR and driving away the base since 2000......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
What would happen to this guy if there would have been no insurance at all? This is no chimera--I can point you to a new trend emerging in "going bare."

Its kind of annoying having to deal with constantly defending attachments, garnishments and asset exams - and eventually, the location of those assets slips loose.

46 posted on 08/08/2003 10:13:36 AM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine (Killing FR and driving away the base since 2000......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Or spending them down.

You'd take the case with no insurance, and uncertain assets and a not unintelligent defendant highly motivated to thwart you? Do you take a lot of these kinds of cases?

47 posted on 08/08/2003 3:02:04 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
So horrible, it kinda makes you wonder if we've got the whole story.
48 posted on 08/08/2003 3:02:52 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I would have gotten a second or even third opinion before having this surgery.
49 posted on 08/08/2003 4:59:57 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson