1 posted on
08/07/2003 6:34:18 AM PDT by
Maceman
To: Maceman
Works the same way as impeaching a president. It has to begin in the House. Federal judges have been impeached before, but I don't recall it happening to a SC justice.
2 posted on
08/07/2003 6:37:04 AM PDT by
squidly
To: Maceman
Ginzburg's comments are distasteful. An impeachment would be distracting from Bush's agenda and his message of a new tone in Washington. Besides, we'd need a 2/3 vote in the Senate to remove and Republicans will not have that any time soon. We'd be better off getting resess appointments of Bush-nominated judges undermining the filibisters.
5 posted on
08/07/2003 6:42:53 AM PDT by
playball0
(Fortune favors the bold)
To: Maceman
Well, in 1989 the Senate voted 89 - 8 to approve an article of impeachment removing Federal District Judge Walter Nixon from the bench for making "false or misleading statements to a grand jury."
reference Some Dems wanted to impeach Rehnquist after the 2000 election fiasco. I think it is possible to impeach a Supreme. Here is a reference to Gerald Ford's remarks on the impeachment of
Supreme Wm. Douglas in 1970.
6 posted on
08/07/2003 6:48:03 AM PDT by
cloud8
To: Maceman
Yes
7 posted on
08/07/2003 7:07:59 PM PDT by
CPT Clay
To: Maceman
O'Connor said similar things a few weeks ago on the George Steponallofus talking head show. I never thought I'd hear a sitting US Supreme Court Justice sajing things like that.
Kind of troubling, isn't it?
8 posted on
08/07/2003 9:07:45 PM PDT by
Clinging Bitterly
(Keep forgetting to update this thing from thread-specific taglines. Am I the only one?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson