Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Masturbating may protect against prostate cancer (Hold Muh ... Oh Never Mind)
New Scientist ^ | July 16, 2003 | Douglas Fox

Posted on 07/16/2003 11:39:00 PM PDT by Timesink

NewScientist.com

 
 

Masturbating may protect against prostate cancer

 
19:00 16 July 03

Douglas Fox, Adelaide

 

It will make you go blind. It will make your palms grow hairy. Such myths about masturbation are largely a thing of the past. But the latest research has even better news for young men: frequent self-pleasuring could protect against the most common kind of cancer.

A team in Australia led by Graham Giles of The Cancer Council Victoria in Melbourne asked 1079 men with prostate cancer to fill in a questionnaire detailing their sexual habits, and compared their responses with those of 1259 healthy men of the same age. The team concludes that the more men ejaculate between the ages of 20 and 50, the less likely they are to develop prostate cancer.

The protective effect is greatest while men are in their twenties: those who had ejaculated more than five times per week in their twenties, for instance, were one-third less likely to develop aggressive prostate cancer later in life (BJU International, vol 92, p 211).

The results contradict those of previous studies, which have suggested that having had many sexual partners, or a high frequency of sexual activity, increases the risk of prostate cancer by up to 40 per cent. The key difference is that these earlier studies defined sexual activity as sexual intercourse, whereas the latest study focused on the number of ejaculations, whether or not intercourse was involved.

  The prostate produces part of the fluid that makes up semen
The prostate produces part of the fluid that makes up semen

The team speculates that infections caused by intercourse may increase the risk of prostate cancer. "Had we been able to remove ejaculations associated with sexual intercourse, there should have been an even stronger protective effect of other ejaculations," they suggest. "Men have many ways of using their prostate which do not involve women or other men," Giles adds.


Macho exaggeration

Giles accepts the possibility that the men who completed the questionnaires could have lied about their habits. But he doubts this skewed the results, since questions about masturbation are unlikely to evoke the same macho exaggeration as questions about, say, number of sexual partners.

But why should ejaculating more often cut the risk of prostate cancer? The team speculates that ejaculation prevents carcinogens building up in the gland. The prostate, together with the seminal vesicles, secretes the bulk of the fluid in semen, which is rich in substances such as potassium, zinc, fructose and citric acid.

Generating the fluid involves concentrating these components from the bloodstream up to 600-fold - and this could be where the trouble starts. Studies in dogs show that carcinogens such as 3-methylcholanthrene, found in cigarette smoke, are also concentrated in prostate fluid.

"It's a prostatic stagnation hypothesis," says Giles. "The more you flush the ducts out, the less there is to hang around and damage the cells that line them."


Sexual repertoire

His findings suggest an intriguing parallel between prostate cancer and breast cancer, as recent studies indicate that lactating reduces a woman's risk of breast cancer, perhaps because this also flushes out carcinogens. Alternatively, ejaculation might induce prostate cells to mature fully, making them less susceptible to carcinogens.

"All these mechanisms are totally speculative," cautions breast cancer expert Loren Lipworth of the International Epidemiology Institute in Rockville, Maryland.

But if the finding is confirmed, future health advice from doctors may no longer be restricted to diet and exercise. "Masturbation is part of people's sexual repertoire," says Anthony Smith, deputy director of the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe University in Melbourne.

"If these findings hold up, then it's perfectly reasonable that men should be encouraged to masturbate," he says.

 
19:00 16 July 03
 


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: CholeraJoe; xsmommy; dubyaismypresident; Flurry
Thank Goodness it doesn't kill sheep, right, CJ?

61 posted on 07/17/2003 6:25:54 AM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (LNJWGRANP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
And the jokes just write themselves!
62 posted on 07/17/2003 6:26:39 AM PDT by WestPacSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Studies in dogs show that carcinogens such as 3-methylcholanthrene, found in cigarette smoke, are also concentrated in prostate fluid.

My dog quit smoking years ago, and licks himself 5 times a day so I guess he'll be fine.
63 posted on 07/17/2003 6:38:51 AM PDT by yankeedog (I wasn't born in the South, but I got here as soon as I could.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick

Just puppies and kittens are at risk. The kittens deserve to die but the puppies are giving me pause to contemplate.
64 posted on 07/17/2003 6:43:07 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If I can support FR with two kids in college, you can too. Freedom aint free but you can charge it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
See? What did I tell you?! I am so happy now. I think I'll listen to some Eric Clapnor.

65 posted on 07/17/2003 6:45:38 AM PDT by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repeal the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
Hmmm...after reading this..I guess all that time in Submarines during my 20 somethings, have some health bennies! heh heh heh
66 posted on 07/17/2003 6:54:29 AM PDT by Bottom_Gun (Crush depth dummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Good for the prostate, bad for the kitties!


67 posted on 07/17/2003 7:25:17 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I guess the researchers had too much time on their hands.
Or, at least, too much of something on their hands.
68 posted on 07/17/2003 7:38:41 AM PDT by Darksheare ("A predator's eyes are always in front.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Thank Goodness it doesn't kill sheep, right, CJ?
Just lets the ones in "certain states" get a break.

-Eric

69 posted on 07/17/2003 7:51:29 AM PDT by E Rocc (Reality is to liberals what garlic is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
Ewwwwwwwwwww.....more Anna is neccesary to counteract the effects of those pics.

-Eric

70 posted on 07/17/2003 7:55:50 AM PDT by E Rocc (Reality is to liberals what garlic is to vampires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Xthe17th
Jocelyn Elders!?
*Make it stop! Make it stop!*

She wanted to teach third and fourth graders the 'joys' of masturbation, as well as other things.

*A million souls cry out in anguish, in flames and torment. All within a Liberal's Utopia*
71 posted on 07/17/2003 8:01:06 AM PDT by Darksheare ("A predator's eyes are always in front.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; Neets
Yet another article about people with WAY too much time on their hands.
The researchers don't get out much, do they?
72 posted on 07/17/2003 8:04:48 AM PDT by Darksheare ("A predator's eyes are always in front.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: yankeedog
I think I need to go into production. What a tonic. I will make millions. I might need a few employee's, with assitants......... hehehehehe evil side.
73 posted on 07/17/2003 8:08:32 AM PDT by Baseballguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
WAY too much time on their hands

Well at leaset we know that thier time was well spent.

74 posted on 07/17/2003 8:10:20 AM PDT by Baseballguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Baseballguy
Spent in contemplation.. at least.
75 posted on 07/17/2003 8:26:11 AM PDT by Darksheare ("A predator's eyes are always in front.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
But mom, can't I just do it till I need thick glasses?
76 posted on 07/17/2003 8:36:41 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The Endangered Species Act had not saved one specie, but has ruined thousands of American Dreams!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
Need More ANNA!!!
77 posted on 07/17/2003 8:56:50 AM PDT by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
use it or lose it.
78 posted on 07/17/2003 8:58:18 AM PDT by Coleus (God is Pro Life and Straight and gave an innate predisposition for self-preservation and protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Do you like big dogs?


79 posted on 07/17/2003 8:59:46 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (White Devils for Sharpton. We're baaaaad. We're Nationwide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
No... I'd like to think I haven't gone to the dogs!!!
80 posted on 07/17/2003 9:21:55 AM PDT by SierraWasp (The Endangered Species Act had not saved one specie, but has ruined thousands of American Dreams!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson