Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Computer Central
Obviously what you are trying to do is go back to the programs and operating systems that do not use upper memory or multi-tasking interface.

My question is why?
5 posted on 05/05/2003 12:07:48 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1 (POW/MIA - Bring 'em home, or send us back! Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JoeSixPack1
+ upper memory or multi-tasking +
I need a word processor that I like, and that's about it. I want to write on a laptop, and then just copy files to 3.5" disks. I'll use a desktop to get it online. Getting a 486 is within the budget at this time.

In '94, I started writing on a used HP 286 desktop. It had Win 3.0, which I rarely used. I did most of my work between DOS 5 & WP. For the immediate project I have in mind, WP allows 2 screens & macros... That's enough 'multi-tasking' for now.

+ upper memory + - That's a term I've heard over the years. But, I don't know the technical implications, as it applies to what I need.

15 posted on 05/05/2003 12:55:18 AM PDT by Computer Central
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson