Skip to comments.
Dixie Chicks Pose Nude to Answer Critics
Reuters ^
| 4/24/03
| unknown
Posted on 04/24/2003 8:12:19 AM PDT by joy361
Edited on 05/07/2004 5:21:14 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
The Dixie Chicks, Emily Robison, left, Natalie Maines, center, and Martie Maguire, say they are posing nude to make a point.
NEW YORK - The Dixie Chicks appear nude on the cover of a weekly showbiz magazine in a defiant answer to a backlash over their opposition to the war in Iraq.
(Excerpt) Read more at azcentral.com ...
TOPICS: Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-192 next last
To: MadIvan
Would someone please explain to me why it is that being anti-war means you suddenly get a desire to shed your clothing?
It sure ain't gonna appeal to the Islamofacist crowd or the sexually-repressed and easily offended Arab Street, that's fer dang sure. (However, there is no doubt that Uday Hussein would enjoy the sentiment and view...)
81
posted on
04/24/2003 8:41:53 AM PDT
by
demnomo
To: joy361
notice how "the other two" are acting as human shields.
They also throw in positive words like patriotic, hero, etc. on themelves along with the bad words.
This follows the censorship issue spin by the handlers. I bet this cover was pre-planned for the start of their concert next week. In fact every media exposure this week was to prep for the launch of their concerts. Look for reporters to have "giggly" fans saying they still luv da chix.
Is there a protest set up for the first concert? Is
http://www.protestwarrior.com going to be there?
To: joy361
Doxy ChicksThey ought to really hang it up, gig's over gals.
83
posted on
04/24/2003 8:42:34 AM PDT
by
harpo11
(Godspeed Brave USA Troops! My Families Thoughts and Prayers are Being Sent to YOU!)
To: joy361
I thought that photo was made by a FReeper.
84
posted on
04/24/2003 8:43:24 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: luvtheconstitution
Yup. Like good little leftists trolling the masses.
85
posted on
04/24/2003 8:43:40 AM PDT
by
lainie
To: dwilli
I am so SICK of the Dixie chicks.....they're DONE.
86
posted on
04/24/2003 8:43:52 AM PDT
by
smiley
Comment #87 Removed by Moderator
To: longtermmemmory
The media can spin it all they want.... but if CD's don't sell... the chicks are fried.
88
posted on
04/24/2003 8:44:10 AM PDT
by
kjam22
To: joy361
You know until I saw the picture I thought this was a joke! I think I can officially predict that these gals are history.
To: joy361
Girls - Dont let the door hit ya where the good lord spit ya! Try to peddle this junk in Kabul and at the site of the latest Shite pilgrimage. You would be the ditsy bits.
To: longtermmemmory
notice how "the other two" are acting as human shields. LOL
91
posted on
04/24/2003 8:46:15 AM PDT
by
lainie
To: joy361
I'm so damn tired of hearing them whine, and others talk of "blacklisting". What a bunch of crap. The more they whine the worse they look. It is not un-American to disagree with the Dixie chix, it is not Un-American to not want to buy their records.
Anybody who sells anything will tell you, people not only buy the product but the image, attitude, and packaging. The Dixie chix thought what they were spouting would help them sell more records. When it backfired, all of sudden, they are "kinda" sorry, and anyone would won't buy their crap is un-American.
Hollywood types gotta learn to stick with product they are selling and stay out politics. How hard is that! stupid chix.
To: MadIvan
Would someone please explain to me why it is that being anti-war means you suddenly get a desire to shed your clothing? They get the "good "drugs.
93
posted on
04/24/2003 8:47:23 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: joy361
I just opened this picture up in Photoshop. HOLY #*(@! This is the worst "touch-up" job I've ever seen.
It is horrible. I know high school kids who could do better in 2 minutes.
And that is absolutely not Natalie's body. Her head is pasted on at the clavicle bone. To a trained eye, that's clear at normal size, but zoom in and it's obvious to anyone.
I hope the media doesn't give them a pass on this...
To: Big Barbee
I wonder if Saddam thinks his "angels" are hot?
95
posted on
04/24/2003 8:48:52 AM PDT
by
sarasota
To: joy361
They are not nude. All their private parts are covered.
96
posted on
04/24/2003 8:50:17 AM PDT
by
US_MilitaryRules
(A penny saved is a governmental oversite!!!)
To: Richard Kimball
ROTFLMFAO @ stunt t!ts.
97
posted on
04/24/2003 8:50:26 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
( Midnight at the Oasis)
To: US_MilitaryRules
And its not their bodies.
98
posted on
04/24/2003 8:51:04 AM PDT
by
US_MilitaryRules
(A penny saved is a governmental oversite!!!)
To: Howlin
Yeah, but now that the secular Ba'athists are out of power, will posing nude for peace be appreciated by the already liberated-from-Saddam Iraqi people, let alone turn on our US troops and the somewhat conservative fans of Country Music?
For making a "statement, this is lame and a bit late to the game. If it is an attempt to garner sympathy or interest, even males who dig this sort of soft-core stuff won't listen to or buy their music. The teeny-boppers might. Unfortunately for the DC's, teeny-boppers have a short attention span and grow-up.
99
posted on
04/24/2003 8:51:07 AM PDT
by
demnomo
To: ScottinSacto
And here I thought labels always got in the way on clothes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-192 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson