Posted on 04/09/2003 6:31:03 PM PDT by The Lake City Gar
I've been going through posts all day today and have been absolutely overjoyed. It seems as if we're finially making in-roads on preventing another 9-11 or worse. I wish I could bookmark this entire day...This place has it ALL covered, it should be used as a History lesson in years to come...The American Internet at it's FINEST!
But I just thought of something...
Where is the "Nuke Mecca" crowd? The "The only good muslim is a dead muslim" crowd? The "Islam is a death cult" crowd? The "Intern all Arabs" crowd? The "Islam is a religion of peace" crowd?
I've had a few run-ins with these people over the past few months. I've tried to make the obvious case that not ALL 1.6 billion muslims in the world are blood thirsty animals. And I've been called everything from a muslim to a communist to a democrat to a traitor. I've taken a beating for standing up against what I saw as bigotry...And many others have gone through the same.
But today we saw muslims handing flowers to our troops, kissing pictures of President Bush and waiving American Flags.
Is this just an act? Are they trying to lull us into a false sense of security while they are plotting to kill every last one of us in the name of their "Moon God"? Or are many of them simply held against their will by brutal dictators and/or religious fanatics who have warped their muslim ideals and ways?
I choose to believe it's the latter. And I hope the above mentioned crowds are gone for good.
I don't want that kind of fanatical Muslim over here. I read their bloody, occultic book and I know what they believe and what they want. When I say something like that I usually get a reply saying the God of the Jewish Old Testament also commanded His followers to kill infidels. I'm not interested in debating something that happened 3000 years ago, what matters now is that Christians and Jews of today don't kill "infidels", but radical Muslims most assuredly do.
True fundamental Islam is a bloody, cruel, occultic religion. Many thousands of "infidels" have been murdered or enslaved in recent years by radical Islam in places like Sudan, Indonesia, Nigeria, the Philipines, and other places I can't recall offhand, in just the last few years. If you don't believe it you need to read more instead of using your time to make accusatory vanity posts. The truth is there to be found for anyone who wants to know it, but those who are into feel-good political correctness don't want to see it.
I don't want to nuke Mecca, I don't want to kill Muslims, I just don't want them over here waiting for a call to slaughter "infidels". I think the number of Muslims in America who would heed such a call is miniscule, but why should we risk losing more skyscrapers full of Americans to find out how many would? I don't even want Muslims already here thrown out, except for a relatively few known radicals such as that professor in FL and those caught in Buffalo. I just don't want to let in any more Muslims of any stripe, because that will inevitably allow more radicals to slip in with the others.
And BTW, unless I have been given some bad info Spencer Abraham is of Lebanese Arab descent, but not a Muslim. In any case he certainly isn't a radical Muslim.
No, you don't see.
But what I DO see is you changing the topic here.
You and I had been discussing the topic of this thread and of this discussion, you brought up the fact that Bush warned Hussein that if he decided to use chemical weapons, we would use nukes.
Nice try to obfuscate the discussion, better luck next time.
I don't see where you got that.
I simply compared your statement, as follows:
I also do not believe that President Bush would have used a nuke, even in the face of a chemical attack.
...and compared that opinion to the President's stated postion.
It is not me who is obfuscating.
"I don't see where you got that."
I got it from your #69 where you
implied that the Nuke'um crowd
were Christians.
"And they are alive to love America in spite of Christians such as the "Nuke them" crowd, not because of them."
Just letting you know when you
are wrong about something since
you asked..
They are posting right on this thread, why didn't you simply ask them if they consider themselves Christians instead of questioning my statement?
There are ten on this thread alone.
"I got it from your #69 where you implied that the Nuke'um crowd were Christians."
You must have missed posts #5, 6, 15, 20, 23, 33, 39, 43, 72, and 83 on your way to my #69.
Otherwise, you could have simply asked them if they considered themselves Christians or not.
Certain things that are written in the Koran are not peaceful -- not all Muslims practice and believe all that is written in the Koran.
Look at the pictures.......
In the interests of accuracy, I went back through and counted six--and of that six, I am simply going by their one post on this thread; without further questioning them to see if there are any provisos in their advocacy of nuking Mecca. If pressed, I have a hunch that at least most of those six would not just drop the bomb on them without provocation.
Now, let me get this straight...I say that Bush would not have dropped a nuke on Baghdad, but you say that I am wrong because he said he would, and the people on this thread say that they would nuke Mecca, but you say they won't...in spite of the fact that they say that they are in favor of it?
Where is this stated as an "official policy" of this administration?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.