Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nasa E-mails prove that Nasa knew - and I told you so - anyone care to apologize?
2/27/03 | Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Posted on 02/27/2003 6:18:03 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
ROFLMAO!
21 posted on 02/27/2003 6:34:03 PM PST by wimpycat (Mr. President, we must not allow a mine-shaft gap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
I see you noticed that one also.
22 posted on 02/27/2003 6:34:03 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
I wasn't here when you got flamed, however, I want to clear some things up that you said. This is NOT a defense OR indictment of NASA. It's simply some items you should consider:

1. Thermal tiles physically CANNOT be repaired in orbit. Not only is it impossible to do, the shuttle does not even carry spares.

2. The astronauts could NOT have made an EVA to check for tile or structural damage, even if they wanted to. Besides the fact that, due to the nature of Columbia's mission, the necessary EVA equipment was not on board, there are no handholds or other EVA "aids" on the wings or underside of the shuttle. Gene Cernan (Apollo 17) was almost killed during his Gemini EVA because no one had thought to add handholds to the craft.

3. Assuming that NASA knew of critical, irrepairable damage, nothing could have been done. Again due to Columbia's mission profile, a rendezvous with the ISS was impossible. It would have taken too long to prep another shuttle, and Russia can barely produce two 3-man Soyuz ships per year. Unfortunately, the choices would have been to strand them in orbit, or risk re-entry anyway.

Unfortunately, IF NASA knew about it ahead of time, there was nothing that could have been done. Whether or not they theorized, proposed, or were absolutely certain of significant risk beforehand is immaterial to the actual disaster. If nothing else, this brought to light not only the inherent flaws in STS, but the known and accepted risks of spaceflight. Don't think that those 7 astronauts were not aware that critical damage to the ship meant almost certain death.
23 posted on 02/27/2003 6:34:09 PM PST by smokeyjon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
My first post on this forum......I was the first person on this forum, or ANY forum for that matter, who posted a warning

I think Lawyer Bronco just got Busted.
24 posted on 02/27/2003 6:34:39 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh; Jael; TLBSHOW
We all got flamed on this issue.

Take heart. We all want NASA to be safe and effecrive.

Hopefully, o'Keefe will get nuked next. Bill Nelson was on o'reilly about these emails today..
25 posted on 02/27/2003 6:34:47 PM PST by fooman (PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
I almost put Hmmm,great minds.
26 posted on 02/27/2003 6:34:55 PM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
"I wrote "It wouldn't be the first time someone in a government-funded program or agency skirted the truth in order to justify their mistakes, or to avoid negative fallout."

An excellent example of moderator complex. No reason why this post shouldn't have stayed.

27 posted on 02/27/2003 6:35:11 PM PST by yooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Since I've taken a stance in your behalf, would you be so kind as to explain the logic discordancy you've expressed in when your first post was?
28 posted on 02/27/2003 6:35:38 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Hmmm.

My thoughts exactly but he's an attorney and is use to speaking from both sides of his face.

29 posted on 02/27/2003 6:36:01 PM PST by Democrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Noone asked him if tiles could be repaired.

Was it this Noone?


30 posted on 02/27/2003 6:36:16 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
Wonder if he's ever signed on as...


31 posted on 02/27/2003 6:36:18 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

32 posted on 02/27/2003 6:37:21 PM PST by katnip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: smokeyjon
1. Thermal tiles physically CANNOT be repaired in orbit. Not only is it impossible to do, the shuttle does not even carry spares.

Stop with the facts man. Nobody wants to hear your facts. This is an emotional issue and your are intruding with your facts. Get real!
33 posted on 02/27/2003 6:37:22 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Hi, Noone!
34 posted on 02/27/2003 6:37:50 PM PST by clintonh8r (It is better to be feared than to be respected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
I am shocked that the freep audience would be so unkind. I disregard most flamers. I am trying to decide whether my thick hide or superior intellect carries me further. I also have picked up on various bureaucrats lying as well as politicians. Somehow it comes with the territory in spite of opinions to the contrary.
35 posted on 02/27/2003 6:37:57 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokeyjon
That's a suicidal do-nothing loser attitude. There were MANY things that could have been done, had people be set to do them.
36 posted on 02/27/2003 6:38:17 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Where's the "nanny, nanny, boo, boo?"
37 posted on 02/27/2003 6:38:52 PM PST by mhking (Baghdad Weather thru Wed 3/5: Ptly Cloudy Highs 60's-70's / Lows 30's-40's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
I feel sad for you, and your small little world where your kicks come from attacking people and insulting them because you don't like their profession.

All lawyers are guilty until proven innocent. It is lawyers that have done more to pervert the rule of law in this country than anyone else. If you don't like that assessment, tough. Police your ranks better, and this attitude will go away--EVENTUALLY. But your profession has slacked off far too long to be trusted in this generation.

I happen to be one of the last remaining bulwarks between the government and the citizens, fighting hard day by day to protect our freedoms. I'm proud to be a lawyer - a son of the Constitution.

You mean like those guys who argue that the 2nd Amendment is a collective right, but that the 1st Amendment means that one has a Constitutional right to kiddie porn?

Sorry, your profession does not rate your stuck-up self-important opinion of its value.

You show up sounding like an ambulance chaser looking for an excuse to sue, you're going to get treated like one.

BTW, those memoranda you're referring to do NOT say what you claim they do--they are not nearly as definite as you describe them. But since lawyers have long since taken to lying about what documents actually say, I'm not overly surprised.

38 posted on 02/27/2003 6:39:43 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tupac
non illegitimi carborundum....
39 posted on 02/27/2003 6:39:53 PM PST by fooman (PC Kills!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Look up my thread history here. I have already posted that my old posting name was "Bot-a-Bing".

My first post as "Bot-a-Bing" was my post on the Bush-Gore situation - it was such breaking news that it got copied and pasted by various other news sites, and i provided that link. It also was so scary and upsetting (understandably) to my fellow conservatives here, that many of them totally flamed me and insulted me for ever suggesting it.

I ended up getting banned from this forum a couple threads later as Bot-a-Bing, for posting my opinion that because of my belief in the constitution, my country, and my legal opinion that the Florida Supreme Court had violated our Constitution, I would not ever accept Gore as president. I got banned for that.

My first post here as Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh was the Nasa Press Conference thread.

Odd that BOTH of my posting name first posts were treated almost the exact same way by so many members of this community.


p.s. My Bot-a-Bing account was later unbanned, based on my emails to Robinson. But I lost my password and no longer have the original email so i just made another account.

So this was my first post, as Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh. I already stated that I was previously Bot-a-Bing in another thread here, so i'm not hiding anything at all. Look it up.
40 posted on 02/27/2003 6:40:09 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson