[balrog666]

I am sorry I should have been much more clear (wow). Facts that prove a position.

Get a clue - the use of the word "proof" is not scientific.

Allow me to point out that arguing from a position with no attendant facts produces no useful conclusions. Got any facts to offer, dumbass?

[CyberCowboy777]

I could buy a clue, but with advertising today I cannot know the nature or intent of that clue. Also the interpretation of the clue by others could lead to the wrong theory.

Proof is possible and is scientific, when the method is completed. I can prove that the earth is not flat with science, or I can prove the earth is "round" with science.

Fact

I have the fact that you feel it necessary to demean and call names.

While this fact (provable by providing a link to your statements and the IP log) by itself does not prove creationism or disprove evolution, it does provide circumstantial evidence of a overall lack of certainty within the evolutionist camp.