In my original post, I stated someone else's post as a fact. I later stated that that was how I remembered it from a thread.
That person works with the victim's brother.
I seem to recall something was taken as gospel truth by pro-Westies because "Someone who works with Damon" said it. Remember, cyn?
I seem to recall something was taken as gospel truth by pro-Westies because "Someone who works with Damon" said it. Remember, cyn?Yes, I remember. Even that story about the dog "hitting" on the neighbor's house was dragged up again today. Never mind that the dog's reaction in DW's garage was used to get a search warrant (all part of the record and not deemed illegal or inapproriate, but in fact, compelling,) is ignored, buttressing your earlier point about irrelevancies given ascendancy over pertinant details.