Yes, I remember. Even that story about the dog "hitting" on the neighbor's house was dragged up again today. Never mind that the dog's reaction in DW's garage was used to get a search warrant (all part of the record and not deemed illegal or inapproriate, but in fact, compelling,) is ignored, buttressing your earlier point about irrelevancies given ascendancy over pertinant details.
Have you now a changed mind on that subject?
BTW, as I have stated many times: If the dogs had hit anywhere the police wanted them to hit it would have been used by Dusek in the trial. They didn't ,he didn't.