Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: HairOfTheDog
I absolutely agree! What I love about Tolkien's book is that men are portrayed as men really are. Men being men. Actually - and I don't care what other women say - I think the story would be ruined if he had put a female in the fellowship. The women in the story are strong, intelligent and leaders in their own right, but each character has his or her own role to play. The book reflects the standards and culture of Tolkien's time - not our time. If anybody has a problem with that, well, too bad! What is - is. :-)
22 posted on 11/21/2002 8:56:26 PM PST by sneakers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: sneakers
The book reflects the standards and culture of Tolkien's time - not our time.

True, but not comprehensive.

The book is about an epic quest and medieval style warfare. Females are utterly outclassed in this type of combat.

Some argue that women of today can function effectively in combat. And they are probably perfectly capable of competing equally as pilots and in other combat roles. But few will claim that women could serve effectively in the Special Forces or paratroopers.

Muscle-powered combat, as in LOTR, puts an enormously greater empasis on physical prowess than any form of modern combat. Putting women into a pike formation or a heavy cavalry unit would be like putting them into the defensive line of an NFL team. They just could not compete, and as a result would be quickly slaughtered.

One of the most irritating aspects of much modern fantasy is its predilection to just ignore the basic facts of human biology.

24 posted on 11/23/2002 10:02:24 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson