Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Secret Vice of Power Women
MSN/Slate ^ | 14 November 2002 | Michael Kinsley

Posted on 11/16/2002 3:22:05 AM PST by Chemist_Geek

(Note: In the marital relations system, the people are represented by two separate but equally important groups: the wives who watch Law & Order obsessively, and the husbands who don't. This is their story. Ka-chunk.)

Recently I got married, fairly late in life for that sort of thing, and have made astonishing discoveries. Most of these revelations turn out to be common knowledge. But one, I believe, has not been widely aired.

People's Exhibit A (my wife), Your Honor, is a formidable, intelligent woman with an important and challenging job and a full private life. (Also undeniable loveliness and charm, which are not strictly relevant to the present case.) She doesn't squander her time. And yet she spends many hours a week watching reruns of Law & Order—often back-to-back (the shows, that is).

It would be misleading to call her a fan. Law & Order, the long-running crime drama, is not just one of her favorite TV shows, or even her very favorite. Other than reruns of Law & Order, she has almost no interest in television at all. Specifically, she has no interest in any of the (to me) barely distinguishable Law & Order spinoffs and rip-offs (such as Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, Law & Order: Criminal Intent, Law & Order: Double-Entry Bookkeeping, CSI, CSI: Miami, Mayberry R.F.D. and so on.) She's not even interested in new episodes of Law & Order itself. She couldn't tell you what night it's on and has no view about what this country is coming to when a man like Fred Thompson can be plucked from the obscurity of the United States Senate and entrusted with the responsibility of running the prosecutor's office on Law & Order.

Nor does she care—or even, possibly, notice—whether it is Michael Moriarty or Sam Waterston who is being unvarnished in any episode she may be watching. Don't ask her whether the female assistant district attorney is the blonde or one of the brunettes. Don't attempt to amuse her by predicting what demographic category the judge will be from. ("They've had four black women in a row, so I'm thinking white man. No, I know, that's ridiculous, so I'll go with white woman—but in a wheelchair. Whaddya think, Honey? Honey?? Ouch, that hurt. OK, never mind.")

Exhibit A and I assumed that this was our little secret. Perhaps it had to do with our weather here in Seattle, which affects some people oddly. Or too much coffee. But then we had a visitor from the East Coast who announced that his wife was about to become the TV critic of a major newspaper. "And the amazing thing," he added, "is that she never watches TV except for reruns of Law & Order."

Good grief. I began making discreet inquiries. My closest chum in Washington is a political columnist and TV pundit. I thought I knew her pretty well. Turns out that for years, on all those evenings when I assumed she was at parties to which I wasn't invited, she was at home watching reruns of Law & Order. The dean of a major business school poured out a similar confession, as did a senior editor at a newsmagazine. The girlfriend of one of my Slate colleagues. Half the women at the University of Texas (according to another Slate colleague, who may be exaggerating). Another Washingtonian, this one a teacher, though her husband says she is "drifting back to C-SPAN." Always women. Always high-powered. Always Law & Order. Always reruns. What on earth is going on?

It is not a cult, because a cult is communal. Sex and the City has a cult following: Women, especially, watch it together and/or discuss it the next day at work. New episodes are considered, on balance, a good thing. The obsession with Law & Order is something different. Far from discussing it with one another, women seem to watch it alone and may be unaware that anyone else shares the habit.

Exhibit A may be an extreme case. In a rare glimpse into this secret world, Molly Haskell wrote an essay last April for a local section of the New York Times in which she frankly and courageously labeled herself a Law & Order addict. But she claimed to discuss the show freely with other addicts. She also described her addiction as an essentially New York phenomenon, which suggests that even Haskell does not appreciate the full extent of the situation.

This would all be merely curious except for one ominous recent development. Law & Order reruns used to be scattered across the cable schedule like wildflowers. (Or weeds.) To catch them all, you needed to be able to play the remote control like Paderewski. More important, you had to control the remote control. Under these circumstances, only the smarter and more high-powered women were able to indulge this temptation. Now, though, TNT cable has exclusive rights to Law & Order reruns and, near as I can tell, runs them more or less all the time. That means Law & Order addiction is now available to all women with access to even basic cable.

This presumably is just the kind of chic new social problem the Democrats are being advised to rebuild their party around, now that George W. Bush has solved all the old ones. The new Democratic leader in Congress, Nancy Pelosi, is just the kind of dynamic, smart, take-charge person who can ...

Uh-oh. Do you suppose ...?


TOPICS: Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: chrisnoth; fredthompson; lawandorder; obsession
It's not just women. Don't ask me to explain it, either. Instead of getting on the ham radio or the Internet, or going out to visit friends, many evenings lately (especially after the election!) I find myself on the couch with a bowl of microwave popcorn, adding to "my extensive (12+ years) legal education."

One other thing, and that's I am not sure that Law & Order - Double Entry Bookkeeping would fly all that well.

1 posted on 11/16/2002 3:22:06 AM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
I am a total Law and Order Junkie. On Monday nights they have it at 7, 8 and 11. I am in heaven.
2 posted on 11/16/2002 7:41:23 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
I hope you prefer Michael Moriarty to Sam Waterston! It's like the difference between Bush and Gore ;-)
3 posted on 11/16/2002 7:43:32 AM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
Strange, here I am, this powerful Homemaker, and I've never really watched it.......
4 posted on 11/16/2002 8:30:21 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Stranger yet is that he thinks that CSI is a spin off from Law and Order. Aside from the fact they are both shows about crime there is no comparision.

a.cricket

5 posted on 11/16/2002 9:08:21 AM PST by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
I like the acting style of Waterson. I loved Dianne Weiss when she was the DA, I like Fred Thompson as the new DA, but they only drag his carcus out when they need him to say something extremely right wing.

I am very in love with Law and Order Criminal Intent. That's the best one ever. Sunday Nights, 9pm.
6 posted on 11/16/2002 9:39:22 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
You didn't think Waterston was break into tears at any moment? The show became really predicatble after 4 yrs, unfortunately.P.D.James once said that crime and legal dramas and fiction appealed mostly to conservatives,do you know that?
7 posted on 11/16/2002 9:51:08 AM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
I can see how it applies to conservatives, we are usually more interested in intellectual persuits and finding justice.

I think the show is the best written show on TV. Well, that and Everyone Loves Raymond.
8 posted on 11/16/2002 10:05:53 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
P.D.James, who is a conservative btw, thinks it has to do with readers and viewers looking for a moral center and certitude to the dramas.Though justice may not be done, the readers know that the moral truths which preserve an orderly society, are going to be on display and challenge the protagansists to be grapple with them to a satisfactory conclusion.
9 posted on 11/16/2002 10:29:39 AM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
I got a little peeved this week when Briscoe (Jerry Orbach) said he "didn't vote for the guy," referring to Bush in connection with some kind of gun violation in the case they were investigating.

Dick Wolf, who signs off on the scripts for all the Law & Order shows, seems to be taking a slant on the FBI which implies that all kinds of ominous big brother violations of the Bill of Rights are being hatched in Washington. FBI agents are no longer simply big footed fools. Some new and supposedly dangerous element has been added, it seems to me.

Tonight's Law & Order, Criminal Intent had an absolutely horrid script --- muddled through and through --- about the moral dilemma suffered by an American traitor as he contemplated the righteousness of becoming a suicide bomber in New York.

I watch the shows, but I never forget that Dick Wolf is an active and committed liberal Democrat.

10 posted on 11/17/2002 8:03:08 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beckett
I agree about the gratuitous and totally out of character comment the script had Briscoe make about guns, particularly since it followed the line, "The President likes guns." Other than generally being in favor of whatever amendment gives us the right to bear arms, I don't recall much in the way of gun liking remarks by the President.

I also agree that the new DA, former Senator Fred, is only on the show in order to make him look foolish.

Speaking of gratuitous political comments self-indulgently thrust into entertainment shows by left-wing wackos, my daughter, a girl I've raised right, has gotten positively militant about this. She immediately drops a show when this happens. She liked the Gilmore Girls a lot, but when the daughter was going to write a paper on how wonderful Hillary Clinton is, she turned it off forever.

She abandoned Angel when Cordelia (whose character probably never had a political thought in her life) said, "I know who's president, but I wish I didn't."

She is a big law and order fan so I can only hope she missed the episode with the "I didn't vote for him comment."

11 posted on 11/18/2002 9:36:32 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: beckett
The various Law and Orders have been on a real stem-cell kick lately, completely misrepresenting the Bush position on the issue and essentially claiming that embryonic stem cell research will cure everything from Parkinsons Disease to hangnails. Dick Wolf's political slant is a bit tiresome, no matter how well written and acted the programs may be.
12 posted on 11/18/2002 10:51:36 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
On Monday nights they have it at 7, 8 and 11. I am in heaven.

Tonight it's on from 7 PM EST straight through to midnight EST. I may take a break at 10 PM EST to watch CSI Miami...

If, that is, I retain the ability to manipulate the remote control. ;-)

13 posted on 11/18/2002 12:49:19 PM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson