Not to make too fine a point on your dazzling argument, but if my aunt woulda had balls, perhaps she woulda been my uncle. I suppose you have faith that such a simpler organism existed in the past and was easier to spontaneously generate than a more complex one?
Let me get this straight. We all know that life originated on at least one occasion in the universe.
Evolutionists say that the likeliest explanation is that life originated based on the same laws of chemistry and physics that we see in everyday existence. But Evolutionists do not claim to know the exact structural-chemical pathway by which life originated.
Creationists say that the likeliest explanation is that God created the life through magical processes which have never been shown to exist -- a literal Deus ex Machina.. But they know based on their readings of ancient religious literature. Of course, most of them are not willing to stick to any falsifiable claims (like, that the Earth is 6,000 years old, or any particular age) even while they nit-pick the slightest variation in evolutionary theory.
And yet Creationists say that what Evolutionists are proposing is unlikely, and that Evolutionists have failed to show their process?