Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

is the .223 a typical 'sniper' round?

Posted on 10/11/2002 4:58:34 PM PDT by RichardEdward

i would have thought the .223 is a little 'light' for a tpical snipe round.. thought most military/etc snipers used a .308 or more powerful round.. or .. if they were going for quiet.. would =use a subsonic .22 lr

as for the al crapa 'link'..I think there is no link.... afterall, wouldnt they be using eastern block type caliber? since that is what they train with???

anyone have any more info on this?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
From what I've heard, a .308 is a lot more typical for a sniper round.

The .308in./7.65mm former NATO round is similar to the previous US battle round, .30'06 Springfield. These calibers are North American "Big Game" calibers and are reliable up to large bull elk. As a sniper caliber, the .308 was used in VN. It does well in the jungle because the round is heavy and traveling fast so that leaves and twigs won't disturb its path to target.

Other than the AR15/M16 in .223in/5.56 NATO (current), .223 caliber is a "Varmint" caliber. Long shots across flat land with no vegetation to penetrate, to down a coyote or vermin. If you'd lost a good horse to a prairie dog hole you'd want to shoot the "cute" little creatures too.

My guess is the A-hole that is doing the carnage is a disturbed little wimp and is using this caliber because it shoots straight, has a small report, and doesn't kick much.

21 posted on 10/11/2002 5:28:31 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
The caliber .223 Remington cartridge, 55 grains, factory load, drops 3.5 inches in 100 to 200 yards, 13.1 inches at 300 yards. One would have to be a very good shot even at 100, to 200 yards. Not a sniper rifle, these people are morons who talk this way. On TV last night the Media was talking about 4 mile shots, this is obviously a 50 cal. sniper rifle not a .223.

GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE DO.

22 posted on 10/11/2002 5:29:56 PM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
For urban use, an IDEAL " sniper " round : fired at close ranges,a fast-moving varmint-style bullet would be devastating. Move out to the 200-300 yard line, and it would still be pretty deadly-just not as expansive.

I do believe the word "sniper" is being misused somewhat- mainly because it fits media pre-conceptions.

To the media, a sniper is anyone who fires a shot from concealment-or without being noticed-regardless of range.

To the media, a rifle is automatically a high-powered rifle- even if it's great grandpaw's old .44/40 lever action.

Similarly, any rifle using the 5.56mm / .223 caliber cartridge is automatically an "assault rifle " - even if it's a single shot pistol ,or a bolt action, small magazine repeating rifle . The media "knows" this is a "military cartridge" - even though it was based on an older .22 centerfire woodchuck/varmint load , developed in the late 50's. The performance of the two rounds would be very nearly identical.

23 posted on 10/11/2002 5:30:09 PM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
These are my gutt fellings. I could be wrong. Others should chime in.

I don't think the 0.223 has much powder behind it when compared with the larger rounds mentioned on this thread.  I believe the fifty caliber is the military weapon of choice.  Lesser calibers would work for lesser ranges.  I don't believe the 0.223 is accurate for much more than 200 yards.  Others may disagree.  I've heard the media rattling off figures like 400 yards.  I wouldn't agree with that.

The combination of the light slug, plus the limited powder behind it, make the 0.223 an unreliable weapon except in peacetime use such as we are seeing.  The slug is light enough that wind could affect it's accuracy quite a bit.  And the rain this morning would play havoc with it as well.

The 0.308 or 7.62mm rounds are superior to the 0.223.  I'd think the 0.308 would be accurate for between 300 and 400 yards.  The 7.62 could be accurate for 800 yards or more.  But the 50 caliber would be accurate for serveral thousand yards.

The shape of the actual slugs is also important.

With any of these slugs, it's accuracy would depend to a large degree on the weapon used, it's length of barrel and the sighting system employed.  Course the final variant is the shooter himself.  Evidently this guy has become quite adept at using his weapon.

24 posted on 10/11/2002 5:30:21 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
It depends upon what is defined as a sniper. At 300 yards a 20-06 is jusy getting started. There was a high school kid two years ago shooting at small targets at 1,000 yards with an M14. I think his name was Schuster. 100 yards is not sniping in my book. It's close range. The idiot in Maryland is not a sniper in all probability. He can use any caliber or weapon he wants. Thirty years ago I used to regularly shoot at 100 yards with a Ruger single .22 pistol. (Today, I can't even see 100 yards. I'm down to three inch targets at 75 feet with pistol.

Ha, I know the feeling. When I was a kid I could light a match with a .22 at a hundred yards using iron peep sights.

When I started shooting on Uncle Sam's ranges, 150 yds with a M-16 and iron sights was easy.

At 50, I can't see my front sight and the target at the same time.

25 posted on 10/11/2002 5:32:27 PM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
A Thompson Contender single shot pistol in .223 caliber can be a very accurate weapon. With a scope, it is still small enough to be concealable yet accurate enough to do what this maniac is doing. Carrying around a mini 14 or an AR15 is not the smart thing to do.

I would think a Thompson Contender would be more of a choice in order to conceal and for accuracy.

IMHO----I would shoot this sick sob in the head and keep him away from the lawyers if he is ever caught.

They are now saying that there are several people who may be involved. Sounds to me like a terrorist situatuion.

26 posted on 10/11/2002 5:32:49 PM PDT by Radioactive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
Isn't the .223 a round used in many military rifles?

Oh dear. Get thee to the range.

Yes, the M16, M4, AR15, etc, etc are chambered in .223.

The military likes .223 because it is light and troops can carry *lots* of ammo. It is not considered a sporting cartridge for whitetail deer. This should tell you something about this "high power" round.

Much of the western word prefers 7.62 NATO aka .308 in Amerispeak. 308 is an excellent sniping round and battle rifle round but the bullet alone weighs more than the entire round of .223.

Everything you ever wanted to know about .223.

An excerpt from:

http://www.snipercentral.com/caliber.htm

5.56x45mm NATO (.223 Rem)

The .223 is used for law enforcement applications, largely because some agencies fear the over penetration of the .308 round in hostage type situations. The .223 generally splinters on impact, allowing almost no excess penetration that could possibly hit innocents, such as hostages. But with this fragmentation and lack of penetration comes a necessity for more precise shot placement, leaving almost no room for error. The .223 has a small temporary wound channel (Stretch cavity), requiring almost a direct hit on the spinal stem in order to get "lights out" on a target. The lighter .223 bullet, with its low ballistic coeffecient, is very susceptible to the effects of wind, which really limits its long range potential. While it is possible to achieve acceptable accuracy at 600 meters on a calm day, it is too risky on the windy days to really consider this round for military sniping purposes. Due to the lack of penetration and lack of energy, the .223 should only be used in very rare circumstances and only on head shots. There is more then one instance when a target has been shot with a perfectly placed center mass shot, and it failed to incapacitate the target. The very heavy .223 bullets (75gr +) are becoming more popular in long range shooting, but the special barrels and rifles required to shoot these high BC bullets are not available as standard sniper rifles to everyday snipers.

Note: In order to stabilize the 69-gr. Bullets and heavier, the twist on the rifle barrel needs to be at least 1:8"

Recommendation: only use the .223 within 100 meters and only take head shots if at all possible. If the .223 is all that your unit has in the way of a sniper rifle, be sure to keep in mind the limitations of the round.

27 posted on 10/11/2002 5:33:30 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
No. A .223 is more of an urban 'counter-sniper' round.

That is to say that most cops have AR-15s or similar rifles in their lockers and would use them to take out a sniper, if they can find him.

Seriously, any caliber from .22 rimfire on up could be used for murder.

I hope they take this !@#$!^^&&!! out soon.

28 posted on 10/11/2002 5:33:50 PM PDT by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COB1; Eaker; Flyer; bobbyd; dix; antivenom; RikaStrom
Caliber discussion PING.
29 posted on 10/11/2002 5:34:17 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
Want sniper cal? 22-250 Ackley imp., 243 Ackley imp. or factory 243, but the best 257 Ackley imp with 87gr bullet at 3400 fps
30 posted on 10/11/2002 5:35:27 PM PDT by shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gun142
Expertise needed!
31 posted on 10/11/2002 5:36:41 PM PDT by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
To the media, any gun is a "high powered" rifle. This person is only a "sniper" in the literal sense of the word. This person is just a killer.
32 posted on 10/11/2002 5:36:51 PM PDT by brooklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
22 Hornet is very nice in a rifle. Not much noise, almost no recoil, very flat trajectory. Probably of little use on anything but light game.
33 posted on 10/11/2002 5:37:00 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
At 300 yards a 20-06 is jusy getting started. I presume you mean the 30-06 used by the US army in WW1 and 2? A .223 seems to be quite effective in the hands of this SOB.

----------------------

I'm talking about the same 30-06 used in WWI, WWII, and Korea. It is extremely accurate over long distances. It's trajecory is not influenced by leaves or other small obstructions. Stuff like glass won't stop it. Hell, even the 30 caliber carbine will penetrate through 14 inches of pin3 and still kill someone. I've tested the cartrige.

At the range this so-called sniper is shooting he could use a bow and arrow.

34 posted on 10/11/2002 5:37:45 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: x1stcav
would not a trained sniper know the .223 does not penetrate well and ...therefore... does that not tend to point to a non trained (non al-crappa) wacko?
35 posted on 10/11/2002 5:38:49 PM PDT by RichardEdward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pushi
"I am at least that good a shot--and I don't consider myself an accomplished rifleman."

Likewise.

I might be nit-pickin but am I the only one to gnash teeth when these beltway bozos, who have never fired a weapon, call the round a two-two-three! In my experience they are two-twenty threes.

They seem to think that .223's are "sniper heaven" and the only weapons available in that calibre are military special-forces issue. Heck, I had a Remington Plain Jane bolt action hunting piece. Neat gun!

They also make it seem super friggin human for anyone to shoot sccurately at more than 10 feet. Any midwest/western farm kid can do 100 yards with a .22 (twentytwo).
36 posted on 10/11/2002 5:39:15 PM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
if they were going for quiet.. would =use a subsonic .22 lr

9 mm subsonic works great with a silencer.

37 posted on 10/11/2002 5:41:40 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
bump
38 posted on 10/11/2002 5:42:45 PM PDT by shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
At 50, I can't see my front sight and the target at the same time.

------------------

Wait til you're in your 60s. I have days when I see multiple targes and multiple front and rear pistol sights. I adjust my shooting for one set of blurrs. Back in the Army I hit 36 out of 48 targets at 300 yards with an M1 Garand, fast fire.

39 posted on 10/11/2002 5:45:01 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RichardEdward
Exactly. Most of the posters on this thread have it right that this jerk isn't a sniper; i.e. trained in the classic sense. However, I'm not prepared to rule out that this isn't a Mohammedan-inspired operation. Having spent a lot of time in the region and having observed the military training they receive, I can attest that it's pretty rudimentary. I think the 5.56 in this application is an ideal caliber inasmuch as it's easily mastered by a beginner.
40 posted on 10/11/2002 5:45:11 PM PDT by x1stcav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson