Posted on 10/05/2002 6:14:35 PM PDT by savedbygrace
I need some advice and help. I just got slammed by a misbehaving app's installer and my WinXP box crashed hard.
I've gotten everything back up, except for one vitally important item. When I started MS Outlook, it could not open my Default pst file. That, of course, has my Calendar and tons of saved email messages.
The last backup I did was 9/26/02, so I've only lost 9 days, but if there's a way to restore the more current, but corrupted, pst file, I'd sure like to do it. Everytime I move that pst back to the Default location, Outlook says it cannot access the pst.
The system is a P3-733, 512MB RAM, WinXP Pro, Office XP Pro.
Computer geniuses - what can I do? I'm ready to provide any other info you need to be able to help me. If it's a lost cause, I'll accept that.
Thanks.
STOP. This will waste your time. This works with OST files, not pst. The ost file holds your profile information as agrarianlady stated - this has nothing to do with your local stored information in the pst. Again, it will work with ost files; but, not pst.
Rubbish.
According to this article ("Microsoft cuts Office price on new Macs") a couple of weeks ago, Microsoft "expected to sell 750,000 copies of Office v. X but had sold only 300,000 copies."
Macs include AppleWorks software that reads and writes Microsoft Word and Excel files, so the vast majority of Mac users don't need to shell out extra bucks for MS Office.
![]() |
Actually I just this past week for the first time had a need for a program that is not available on Mac...MS Project. But I run Virtual PC with Windows 2000 on my Powerbook G4 and will purchase it for that. |
As far as I can tell the reason is that the corporate world does not know the difference between "cheap", "inexpensive", and "cost effective".
They want me to use a PC at work. Every day when I start it up, the corporate IT department pushes several minutes worth of updates onto it over the ethernet wire connected to it. This keeps it running reasonably well, but woe be to the user who doesn't have a corporate IT department to keep their machine up to date. I have a Mac laptop and usually bring it to work. Plug it in to the ethernet and it just works with no daily updates and no IT support.
If you have PCs you need a substantial IT department, and the IT manager who chose PCs as thge way to go is an important, highly-paid person. If you have Macs your IT department is a lot smaller.
Which system do you think would do better in a home environment?
I have an example from real life. My wife consults and about once a month has to turn out 50-60 page reports. She is a diehard Windows user. Five times in the past four years her windows box (brand names, Sony and HP) has gotten so screwed up on a weekend with a report due Monday that we have just given up, gone down to the local computer store and bought a new system. The payment for a timely report is enough that this is the best way out of the problem. I have always been able to eventually resurect the old system, but it usually takes a week or so of researching what went wrong and painstaking troubleshooting. This has never happened to my Mac.
I know from first hand experience the difference between "cheap" and "cost effective". BTW, since she buys brand name systems, the cost of one of these is about 85-90% of the cost of a comparable Mac.
Without Office, Corporations would have dismissed the Mac as a Graphics and Desktop Publishing machine, and schools would have dismmissed it altogether.
Dont take my word for it, ask anyone at Apple what would happen if Microsoft stopped supporting the Mac. Apple would be out of business within a single year. Apple cannot sell enough Macs to remain viable with only the home market.
So at one end you have Linux which requires a real computer geek who gets off on running command line programs. Windows is in the middle, which they are progressing in both directions. Wit .NET server they are making more and more admin tasks available via command line scripts, but they are also making it more user friendly and recoverable (system restore and error reporting). Then you have the MAC which appeals to the I just want to turn it on and have it let me browse the web. It's a pretty expensive e-machine, but hey it works.
I went to DOS and ran chkdsk /f. It ran the next time I booted up. After that, I ran the Inbox Repair Tool. Then I moved the two pst files so that one is living in a Backup folder, and the formerly corrupted one is living in the correct Default folder.
Thanks to everyone. I'm happy. Much less damage than I thought I'd be stuck with.
FR rocks.
When that opens look on the left side for system restore and click on that.
Pick a restore point prior the the time of your misfortune with the app installer and click restore.
Sit back and relax. When it gets through with the system restore (be patient) your system will be back as it was at the time you selected before your misfortune.
I haighly doubt that savedbygrace can just drop another 2,000 for another new system, even if OS X is that much better.
So, I had to figure out how to merge that pst with the earlier backup version that only had entries to 9/26.
I'm calling it good now. I'm too tired to go any farther with it.
Good night, Nellie.
When the app got crazy, I tried to uninstall it. It didn't have an Uninstall, so I used Windows Add/Remove. The app refused to be uninstalled AT ALL and XP crashed (it's only crashed three or four times in nearly two years.)
When it crashed, it crushed Outlook. I also had some big problems with Quicken, but it recoverd.
Windows XP ships with a GREAT feature called SYSTEM RESTORE. It works wonders when something like what happened to you occurs. I would highly suggest that you become familiar with this feature of windows XP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.