Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos

We know all that. They weren't Romans at the time, but just a few stragglers from Troy who had a little run-in with Carthage and whose wives had just burned their fleet so it is natural they would be a little testy. At the time of the sack of Rome, there were no Romans in Rome. Everybody else was in Rome; the Romans were elsewhere--still are.


106 posted on 04/22/2005 12:24:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale

I'm not talking aobut the Aenied -- which was a fairy tale concocted to make Caesar Augustus feel good. At the time of the Sack of Rome in the 4th century B.C., the Romans as we know it were in Rome -- they had thrown out their Etruscan kings in the previous century. Whaddya mean the Romans were elsewhere outside rome?


107 posted on 04/22/2005 12:30:28 AM PDT by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson