Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dead
Perhaps we should just have drop-down boxes that allow us to select from a list of acceptable responses.


More pearls of wisdom from Darth Insidious...


"Am seeing a lot more vitriole aimed at Dashle and the Democrats than I am seeing an interest in giving North Carolina the best possible leadership. That's been the tune of the GOP - whether statewide or national - during this entire election cycle. If that's the way they're gonna be, I'll gladly "punish" the GOP. And if the NC party leadership is so clueless, did anyone ever consider that a Bowles victory would be a GOOD thing? That it might justify an enema to bleed out the stagnancy that is "country club Republicanism" in this state?"


The GOP leadership, including Bush for meddling with our elections before the primary, deserves more than just a little spite. They need humbling. I'll gladly cast my vote for Bowles if that's what it takes to bring it to 'em.


I've no problem with seeing the destruction the Republican party. If it's gotten this arrogant, it SHOULD be destroyed, and let something better take its place.

The Republicans are on a power trip as much as the Democrats. And anyone who could support EITHER of them so blindly is not a patriot, but an opportunist.


That the Democrats hate the Constitution is no basis for assuming that the Republicans love it, either.

If the Democrats are evil, the Republicans are making no apparent effort to be defined as "good". The absence of a big fat "D" next to a candidate's name does not/can not mean that that candidate is necessarily better than another.


It's only force-fed if we swallow.

Punish the GOP for their stupidity: vote Bowles.


Are the Republicans so desperate to seize power, that they refer to any and all dissent as "dolts"?

That settles it all the more in my mind: the Republicans may desire power, but they do not *deserve* power.

178 posted on 09/24/2002 2:07:03 PM PDT by gratefulwharffratt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: gratefulwharffratt
I think he'll be happier with the AFers.
189 posted on 09/24/2002 2:10:58 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

To: gratefulwharffratt; Jim Robinson; Texaggie79; Darth Sidious; maxwell; Constitution Day; All
Thanks. If those are legitimate posts by the Opusee (I'm not that acquainted/familiar with Darth), then those, coupled with his comment per Texaggie79......

Maybe it was my comparing the Bush-bots to the Clintonistas.

.....I say, who needs yet another disruptor here? Anyone that doesn't have the moral clarity to see the moral personality differences between bill clintoon and George W. Bush is not a part of what FreeRepublic.com is all about.

I'm for free expression, but undermining the base is not supportive of the cause of Conservatism, just imho.....

283 posted on 09/24/2002 5:12:11 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson