Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts see fertile ground for appeals In Westerfield Trail
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/20020919-9999_1n19appeal.html ^ | September 19, 2002 | Greg Moran

Posted on 09/19/2002 6:19:39 PM PDT by alexandria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
Oh, perhaps one of the sluggo defense attorneys known to spout off around here, will step up to the plate and defend O'Reily...That's about all he can afford, after he gets the pants sued off of him.

sw

21 posted on 09/19/2002 6:42:48 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
Oh come on guys, this is just the media spin. We all know not to believe anything the media reports. Wait, we only can't believe the media if it is....wait....help me, I am so confused.
22 posted on 09/19/2002 6:42:53 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
LOL. I usually keep tinfoil at hand, K. I tend to think in, shall we say, unusual directions.

Sometimes I see too much in the smoke and mirrors, and miss what's sitting in front of my face.

This trial has given me lots of opportunities, sadly.
23 posted on 09/19/2002 6:43:28 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
You can't believe the UT? Say it isn't so...gulp.

sw

24 posted on 09/19/2002 6:48:07 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ican'tbelieveit
This article has actual people and their names quoted. I thought only un-named sources were to be believed. Oh, gosh. What to do, who to believe!!!!
25 posted on 09/19/2002 6:49:35 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: spectre
After reading the article, I don't see why Bill O'Reilly is going to be red-faced.

What am I missing here?
26 posted on 09/19/2002 6:50:48 PM PDT by chaosagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
Have to believe the dogs. They hit on this article, therefore it must not be true.
27 posted on 09/19/2002 6:53:08 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chaosagent
The whole point..that's what you are missing..

sw

28 posted on 09/19/2002 7:10:19 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Me, too. I'm missing the point also and I don't want to. I'd like to see O'Reilly with a bit of red face over his actions. Could someone explain what is in this story that will hurt him? Thanks.

There's a big fight going on at another thread. Redlipstick told Southflanknorth.....that her friends were over here. That's how I found you.

29 posted on 09/19/2002 7:30:29 PM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; UCANSEE2; John Jamieson; CAPPSMADNESS; bvw
PING!!!
30 posted on 09/19/2002 7:37:49 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
You'll see, we don't want to give away what we know..

sw

31 posted on 09/19/2002 7:38:05 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
It shows that Feldman has been following procedures all along.

I suspect the story about the plea bargain is bait to get Feldman to come out to 'defend' himself, and perhaps reveal his appeal strategy.
32 posted on 09/19/2002 7:43:15 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez; spectre
Thanks!
33 posted on 09/19/2002 7:50:17 PM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
Many volumes, not a few chapters.
34 posted on 09/19/2002 7:51:36 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
Not being sarastic with you, Ben...just keep your eyes and ears open. It's not over yet. :~)
35 posted on 09/19/2002 7:52:03 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Hi..JJ, we're just checking in. Been busy with other things...:~)

sw

36 posted on 09/19/2002 7:56:32 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: spectre
It's o.k., I've identified the "good ones" on these threads (you're included and sw).
37 posted on 09/19/2002 8:02:16 PM PDT by I. Ben Hurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: I. Ben Hurt
Thanks Ben...you are too. We are just popping in, really. Night, take care, sw
38 posted on 09/19/2002 8:06:09 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: All
Just an FYI:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/753907/posts
39 posted on 09/19/2002 8:15:31 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
Almost like suppression fire. Doesn't hit, just scares the bejibbers out of everyone down range. Chilling to the justice some falsely accussed innocent will get down the line.
40 posted on 09/19/2002 8:30:53 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson